IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Structured Headers: URI type (#782)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 02 May 2019 05:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D5F120044 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2019 22:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2VSGQVcFTgu for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2019 22:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 305731200A0 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 May 2019 22:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hM4Rs-0001U8-5a for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 05:40:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 05:40:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hM4Rs-0001U8-5a@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1hM4Rq-0001TN-7Q for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 05:39:58 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1hM4Ro-0005Rp-Mf for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 05:39:58 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1556775569; bh=ZxCJ3ZVz8iAf4c6bSgW/lSqbS/UTp//Oi04Xt/cnqQs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QbC91E+lOPJcYqEZSoB0XQl4xW8kGrEnIoG1ePED4Zk6n8Mz7w/EADnzxt+YmFd5l rXNPPDgTD9B2d7zEkmU7YEnaBNpggnlV+ZOWQyU3o+E4kOS5YhLhRG8HKsaezxRItw v0wHAYWMbGEwTxPUQN+O+WM8wTJgivb4XJ4HPZm4=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.156.16]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MXGvG-1hG9Vv1xJ0-00YhZ9; Thu, 02 May 2019 07:39:29 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <31F60C8F-907A-44C4-B98E-3F49249A40B8@mnot.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <0bab4850-fbe6-a318-71b2-a0e89a74ae74@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 07:39:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <31F60C8F-907A-44C4-B98E-3F49249A40B8@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:erT0CeEY4suGewnHb1YuOCWFa+fy5jLd+9BJ8bA37KMeqBnAfTb AY2QGn6Jgnxhgrg8o2371PUJ5zKB57v/yD09ZY4YHq7ykAdjnWdWxTx/pMSfRQ9JXMKuwb7 yo98QIAZbp/w4IgjAJIpzDsI4pw3XIiZXgthHBxkmv68UdsWeDLS813oJ/WwPPqpNGX5HTB 4iH67V2piWi557ssUwnhQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qfvhwaLOLjw=:kqIpjLFrBjfPakQknQIr3u Pe4nacAG/IXXnbD23HcjOr4gJ/666enZXuEjryTSgiYsWilozWBCZl6Tyu8426vPdjoQwFphi y45C8zjdbOZcHYZN1cRYthJBcoUEPDlEHtwzMJmbd90kVUmWK/EM4zvFonVc7HOlY45E75Niy ja3dA4DTUvTk5h5RiSG3ykdZS/pEYqjRZ+WSAVmL3JPFByqESuSvDdigxBh0B8wGHomG8ROzo nfJov/Q7DXB833hRNROwfDTp+bjbCUAk2yeADS/fcE1q75IA/KT3dr9N14W+CYW0IOvo6+LUP bR3KjUwGnMv8Y7JIjljY0gKgx1u/L3hB0dSpKLckZVEggKUiWnjh8OUu4kDEpxBdUrFZ1hCVp IaecIkXeCUDoDL7xmCVpnKdUyOqQNVhwuQQUKZK1YDpnfm+AVDgGHH212jOoZKZB4M6e0FCDH TDBAiphwrDcWu2kjnxyco0ylvWAR7GJje2jgtUtGaABEyRvSqnDI8jeYX358b3BqDXammgbNG qidJyM8pl9mrxCczr4guf7TLk81DgGteDAkjAJvddM/Fx1YRepsPDzqasttpRp0RYwH8T2zpt 4kwfd7fHtLFsw232RpRpRDM69NbGopXjgTD5osPczt6xWdOFhoWzB89zWDuklHrzd8WlgN4qh F0SW456m+TrhLaelLlnzK4kWOmU+iMK+dP8J9r5k4K5lAyuCcclr6OuoceBlA3KtUQr4HFTGi f9XD5Wlvznz5WLMyo3NTYCjCgO9QRqbVbfiQVY3usruvczfs4GCABs63utM/UofJnMxtE5Tba oeaV5Uka+JvJ74xfXqDPFaMO9BBymMcdoKPWCZCUxUTf2IoyflY6KDeHRhkZ2Eha+00fc6cm1 t5cK261tgoZ7VmgR9MVN57nSbCz8Lg/qiJmsKv0KqelaBT1C2nCoU5Gr+jaOLYU7wSff6xneC YvEv7XO1pOw==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.351, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1hM4Ro-0005Rp-Mf 16614566d77fba1aba10cda4059b3453
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Structured Headers: URI type (#782)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/0bab4850-fbe6-a318-71b2-a0e89a74ae74@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36571
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 02.05.2019 07:15, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> (Editor hat on)
>
> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/782>
>
> PHK and I have discussed this, and I think we agree that this issue should be closed without any change to the specification.
>
> Any further discussion? We'd like to get this spec shipped.

I don't think that the discussion in the github issue really concluded.
It would be nice if Poul-Henning would follow-up on my replies.

FWIW, my latest comment was: "I think the ability to apply this to the
Link header field is pretty compelling.".

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email