Re: Structured Headers: URI type (#782)

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Tue, 14 May 2019 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA5D120226 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O3sV0Bye02sb for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 974651201D8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hQea2-00077Z-U2 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:03:22 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 21:03:22 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hQea2-00077Z-U2@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1hQeZz-00076f-Kj for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:03:19 +0000
Received: from mail-it1-f181.google.com ([209.85.166.181]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1hQeZx-00031R-Qn for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:03:19 +0000
Received: by mail-it1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 9so1093762itf.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LphrV+PGRooLUuJrlJtVI1q9OuM4MJzXyA+rJ/myGlw=; b=eaVDDB2nmhid1Uw54VgC00Xjml92w3S5SAwo5WXHkie9gAJPnYVbR5aaLHy9HkzBdQ XmCuohopp2auSa2fCgA+BcI1X0hiTcBSfmtRGF1wUeUtFTBrRNX7dgVSQJuH4UEcBjx3 J2udfF/tzLyCeDwhq5DY3RrPbun8wxeeQvo+eGj1P27rDmGlzXj6xBFs3LkgYJ/i398M CwJB6pfE+3+cbq9SP9O6KhIJQWkqvW1wlWCk3dp5z93Tw0DsQOKXcIxR66QouewxXiP8 tGEyxqZqYWosRIx9SjOk6T4Dexk+3bEuAHqEocak31AjCI8mIqZ3kCCCzBUY7SpR7Uhe Cb+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXhDAJ+98/5dmdZcwKkW0O2rQ/Ek+xSa/odyskLnUMXhpDDCtYr 3qeLM/+GotW1UyolsSfYS4fQKPOZtnOyBJyoWfVON1zt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQQ0PNtxd4+7oRA3NHpu+PhV31TfJ5dVunaDygz7owRfQO8Cp6LKhTUQKc7pfAsql8rioYv6xPykBiyyHICfc=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:32cb:: with SMTP id j194mr4493144ita.168.1557867776733; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <31F60C8F-907A-44C4-B98E-3F49249A40B8@mnot.net> <84525629-553D-4D42-9FD4-36DD995710CA@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <84525629-553D-4D42-9FD4-36DD995710CA@apple.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 07:02:49 +1000
Message-ID: <CACweHNC3Wo7FOXa=c1Bq9+dBuHpQwNc+F--ZQx833x5=RAk2Kw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.166.181; envelope-from=phluid61@gmail.com; helo=mail-it1-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.027, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1hQeZx-00031R-Qn 6e8cffefa31bcd246a792e2018cbd2b8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Structured Headers: URI type (#782)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CACweHNC3Wo7FOXa=c1Bq9+dBuHpQwNc+F--ZQx833x5=RAk2Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36642
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 03:57, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As with #781 on SH, we've had some discussion back and forth on this one, without clearly concluding the discussion.
>
> We'd like to get a sense of the group's consensus so we can move forward with the document. Please reply with which option you think will be be best option to be able to ship the document:
>
> A. Leave the document as-is, without specifying a URI type for SH; note that URI types can be added in a future revision
> B. Specify a URI type for SH as a String
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy (chair hat on)
>

A.

To be clear, B means: add a new type, and add that to sh-item ?  What
does it say about syntactic structure and restrictions of the new
type?  What value do we get out of doing it (assuming that means
"doing it now, quickly")?

Cheers
-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  https://matthew.kerwin.net.au/