IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Structured Headers: URI type (#782)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 02 May 2019 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC491120240 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2019 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3gM0sk4O5vsr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2019 23:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D2C120052 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 May 2019 23:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hM5ZY-0000TS-Dy for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 06:52:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 06:52:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hM5ZY-0000TS-Dy@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1hM5ZW-0000SM-BO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 06:51:58 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1hM5ZO-0001bn-D8 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 06:51:58 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1556779885; bh=5DhhCC9xV0r2XLvfndRWgsNHnyNmvL56X5Ck+ZuHwv4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Fx2oQof4MhJsV3ZVIUU0SyLNP4jYGSEuEgSL3hmQs8EYMBFaiH1AmEBLcbmgx6Se+ FhIAEmwJ+BI1B+hi3i2EfHUWV2TQs9Q2p7IKF+g+6HpliLik6WQcyAq3Nn1co8nFLn bqY45Gs9EBoG/uRl95DkFHTy/MhtucdgTWDsPQO4=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.156.16]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lmazv-1gmTZ01tNT-00aF7d; Thu, 02 May 2019 08:51:25 +0200
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <31F60C8F-907A-44C4-B98E-3F49249A40B8@mnot.net> <0bab4850-fbe6-a318-71b2-a0e89a74ae74@gmx.de> <5388.1556777979@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <ee323ab0-033f-fdfe-cbbc-59f1d1b8dc29@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 08:51:22 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5388.1556777979@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:El6wxRwqr8PErZ4BUJihwTIaTSr5fWLg5L7yORLi/TtLy/yJop8 mP5xpNU4u57RYLqtCXdwpQuumXiJ0cwXI45UDka+P6a2NUOzfy0asDjYMkDJzenvdDeC+me 6YbdAsInFAuKrl82Q6/SN6cQVRFYvkj3/6BeZ7LYZNyvr1g0FPQcUHpRCbhrm9MSBMOPj0z P73BEJ0qMtzRSXD+gFU5Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:6rLEgq6dWSg=:3QPWrRt1T3ea+k8QA+FXtx WH+4ZwjbiShnGVE/NFK7uBirrXUs9+LI9xpzBOtrhMp17fXCBnFFAOcurcxtP4ys3SXNnf8I7 nEWuJrMksAh7eyo/Rm7jWX9Lvic1i5+EqXODU6Q3+tfrLhX3NL6gi0riaVfDyV7Ltp07xgVEE ljcLKBmY/mKumJFLsdt2R6EjQYjuIVGVGwC5DLJdryvPfulgRM86GlsXHw76b9y/IDtttaZr9 Gg1NMfZJ7nbqcRgi3GSMdsmIyQtavEsCxjH6OChwBaOArU5A6ezt/cQ488gLff//9I9B02J1J 53w+WcNuXWDW5jFcDs8X6xPTFsIrjpBH0vI2y1LkdolmO7yBhQm9YpOnCyMMHhBx2Q9RPZRSb NLjR3vzLvGV+A6VltBGYfariTkSDJocinqIBsILTEniYnA8F4E/FfjWY4NMg2W6RosUef6iZQ BIbO/rW/sTYEyMCSvkag4+u3nSwGVYkbrjBu6BKw0k+byDzl6J/BRa5/7McKelGUbpA78wU9D FpQAvlhY3G2f6BmN/9qGn5RMfdbfNY9x3EwCqw0UnJMQLXg1hoTslGj+rj4phIRUXVQQAmH1O /dBC/ZIGSLRBESZ57Qumv9WVB/p4tvPKBGoQ66W86G/jWnZha0JrQWSI6mz4qFS1zGH/0brzD gSnalugknniHzO+UHjtn3Ec/KZwnSKgRHfFGu6K39z9E+TYiuRGAhOWk/HlUqT2f6pNKCfiE+ FloIa+c/J1tYy+Cf3X/IIHBIHg9VCU9T8IZXagVmQ1PHvfGBgbkwc93T4l/KziKlpTuvG+3T8 ncxlESzQfjI1t//MSjVwYCwD0zc6nnkARCnVNJOCR+aAmFzdpEkw9TiHZJ/DT4AneRB3m+XhI mZ0UrzY4V2QEPT23fG0W0O0ddA9al7SK45itL6ZOhbYBJrPeewYTL/M6eJybFRb/UyIM3qfLT ZLffbFV9TFg==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.758, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1hM5ZO-0001bn-D8 69985ffe70754e5b56448bfa526d42a2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Structured Headers: URI type (#782)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/ee323ab0-033f-fdfe-cbbc-59f1d1b8dc29@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36580
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 02.05.2019 08:19, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <0bab4850-fbe6-a318-71b2-a0e89a74ae74@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes
> :
>
>> I don't think that the discussion in the github issue really concluded.
>> It would be nice if Poul-Henning would follow-up on my replies.
>
> I really dont have anything to add to what I said a month ago.

What I was referring to was the confusion about the syntax of the Link
header field.

> I can see the point, but not the compelling argument.
>
> First, It's not like we cannot move a URI in SH.  Sh-string are
> perfectly capable of that, and I put sh-binary in the spec as
> "Kernighan-Escape"[1], should that fail.
>
> Second,  If demarcating URIs in SH was important, somebody would
> surely have spotted the deliberate mistake in the strawman syntax
> I proposed a month ago ?

I don't accept that as a serious argument.

> So no, I'm 100% with Mark that URIs are not worth another several
> months of nothing much happening to this draft.
> ...
Once again, please let's argue based on facts, not opinions. Unless you
can prove that it'll take months to add this.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email