IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 16 January 2017 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F103112943A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 22:50:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pH1kFL91SRKJ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 22:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A94B81293F5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 22:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cT14v-0006vN-91 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 06:47:41 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 06:47:41 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cT14v-0006vN-91@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1cT14s-0006to-Rn for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 06:47:38 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1cT14k-00084K-Hh for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 06:47:33 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.79.224]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSZ6u-1c1PVV1EkG-00RdH7; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 07:46:49 +0100
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
References: <CAOdDvNr==BmizwUPKaMZq__UckfM5bAJ0w15=A-R1xrtZ+JxjA@mail.gmail.com> <F1215D6F-1E83-48D2-B1D7-1E86775A20FD@mnot.net> <a28ffb58-5907-117c-69e4-b8e5f2d65c26@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <ea3af488-93cd-69a0-c72c-1695150ea841@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 07:46:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a28ffb58-5907-117c-69e4-b8e5f2d65c26@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OUM0hX+4eXbhZIbLldhI8iqDQT26/R4+FRsPSuJ9e2tw/Sa2uS0 EL9FRYIxFhES3MU4NUX7ScgFYfq/y90uY0RyNe+TjSZR58iqx96gMBDIvZMVYg268MpRy2o XPeO7hjcWa5cr3D2BC90x7hhl21gCVcc4Pf31tElXbldK0QL/NI40HzRwkM30uTOIlwcc82 FaemGWrwvbl2eaoPmAjfw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2i/Jusl5hTg=:qK7HuZYZb/VyAUFSaNC+Km vWdJUtFG8Uit4TsvgtoDiZNrqlB4gFcmoUqQhOw4wVBNN2aJTwNrEMWbqPU2WaYD0SpSfSDFy Pw3TvMReHJ2GK4Fy3djNZa6Lnf97eNhQYwio0zam4dyrycY1MTRVknLcpfBCcPhxyXav8GAJp rACV7bRHCHhoLRNvU0igXl1VjWm1Ly/V49XT5EVVtulCxQgh6QVHOE/+UhI2MN+TJEyQk5YVc JMlhy/+XjpZpIWUEwMEAG9T1LE0GCjS3kl4m9Sipuw/HktoMICl13RD1Qm9wn3mRqLCZtYyp/ HJT1eHNqeYwU1/wd6+H99ly3EqdiiKyg40zCK2J0M5R2W/XL/2X/DMDtcLoZXuNMorJFK88Ly 4BXrPmMGYJj+qsuz06Wa+qjc0/XnAhO5uc9x9D0tZq5MQfaOB8AIET6ttOnwSlPZm3AZA23cp Ffpat0wu3kXYOLVqxVWekMZiVp6MzvgkknYPCLikJH3Yb2IvDZ15zpaY4zQ5VWZDxEMJ/joC+ SjW6H2sctjn6yVwLcDQeB69ZQ1XHPw6DuoMG6hWjXWiCLH4QCBIVnz6fiHWBinfkOdI7+hkUV di1wLko0f9yKdd+2gLQJ6SVgSfSa2IrvQwWLT/iSnJ++se9HwYQ9bDRegPbRHC8xKw6j2uVlw 2roGrRSamtcFU1/dU6zT8K6dsqNj9fDJp2V7+uMNNuV9PZVnzhQlu6ERSAqfuC0QoCx2uK6Kt bDhLHfsB5JZCup7XvjaHWqyWumf5Y1WIshKoV6ZPZoKLDcT8Tf/CkSbJqvSIHQZ6IIVfj4xl7 y6O0ASYKmrgLOcrU+MdkYpJalsvCh3aliF3CY7k0zhlGZ3Vi9PJWdFJI4Mk1aXo6fsw025+LL ua0WMH7j8CtMbMNpWtqAQDSNDhTlZd3HFgPW33yZRPKLRoq1J6HsaKAcX7DNM9At6R+CcswFr yf9NUqsVrmoxamm/NQ7C4ibofbLCQoZM853vcOfp6V2oTo1xtATY9NZWmaNVYKj/biKcaIBgX gFK7PEmRiYspdguSWoKMfoJN0IfaaWDD/57TJrN0MBK8k6AIpRLJHUhYnLm5INvDQg==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.591, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cT14k-00084K-Hh 14876e632d825655b02436ba29040ba4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/ea3af488-93cd-69a0-c72c-1695150ea841@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33288
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2017-01-16 04:33, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> On 2017/01/16 10:29, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Personal hat -
>>
>> I'd prefer Proposed Standard; I don't think we want to overly promote
>> the use of this encoding in new header fields, so calling it an
>> Internet Standard sends the wrong message.
>
> Fully agreed!
>
> Also, Julian mentioned that it might be additional work to move it to
> full Standard, but if this is ever necessary, it can happen as part of

No, I didn't (as far as I remember).

> moving HTTP 1.1 to full standard, with very little overhead.

That's an interesting proposal; however, I'd be very surprised if those 
who don't want it to be full standard would support integration into the 
next set of base specs.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email