IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)

Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Mon, 13 May 2013 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B6021F8629 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJVcpXDpv6Aw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CC321F8E7B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Uc1Dq-0001rQ-LY for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 22:27:58 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 22:27:58 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Uc1Dq-0001rQ-LY@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>) id 1Uc1Df-0001oZ-Je for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 22:27:47 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.219.48]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>) id 1Uc1Df-0000Cl-0G for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 22:27:47 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i4so8088642oah.7 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=N6A6SsZp8/2IdEILgZo1s0jO9O5fq6/P/cZBzNovwb8=; b=h8UkVAYBnmcmz/7ZeSJRvL75eqnaTMegBV4YakR4J3bthAMLgfLDNZaiXl2KVOxUf5 GxDMZO+rw7dsHRXzCL+4P6iLLQSOhzhE9unf97Ny+q7p8VXzCJRf0MrghWa6mR0EZ4wo aBiO3AzEY6moE1KuiEPafJHqH+Xn7d7DGzDjSG32oJ78E/5+CdWAIiYZOE3FU7sSoqkj 9QV0rn8CNxrz5mGRlDOyp9W9GKxlFY0gv5srF+reTWQ4G4F2jgfSa36y7pBnaWtTGLJK zR4XZj46hIr9vcMqSWX6tRC/hP+bn9iQLtWT1Gq1uwMW91mi5btPayVNABgQPlGD2Thi mGtQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.60.73 with SMTP id f9mr2826310oer.43.1368484041161; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: patrick.ducksong@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.13.193 with HTTP; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4WUYjj8HCd-4h+xuQwFBJX1TW4xL-2w_HtmraxBhvv8vaceg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbcfTjN5QFFuGm-P-rQMpAR3FGSC58WCy3qKn+29YCjn+w@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWyVULO5r2boCpz23fTXezTogjmYLa25gwcT-9k4fxNzA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7Rbe9rNi8Y5arMzBZqrRK_QyCruqH-zmHFQhG2xw6sRm3aA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjj8HCd-4h+xuQwFBJX1TW4xL-2w_HtmraxBhvv8vaceg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:27:21 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: wa8vjtfeQIniqDprIs_fS6r4iVs
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNriq4nJ2dapTF2RM_f+70epe+oot8bSB0VHKnJ8S07Siw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
To: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a2e0427874004dca10541"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.48; envelope-from=patrick.ducksong@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f48.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.756, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Uc1Df-0000Cl-0G 8bb0ab1ac8537529f2f27d09045031c7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNriq4nJ2dapTF2RM_f+70epe+oot8bSB0VHKnJ8S07Siw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17983
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org>wrote:

> That's kinda why I don't really want to take this change as is now. I'd
> rather wait for more implementation experience. AFAICT, we have at least 3
> very large scale SPDY server deployments (Google, Twitter, and Facebook),
> and none of them have yet asked for this to be fixed. Maybe they're fine
> with just not calling read() in these situations. I'd rather wait for
> people deploying SPDY & HTTP/2.0 draft implementations to come back and say
> that this is actually a problem and we need to fix it.
>
>
+1 for running code.

We're at a point where most changes should be influenced by that; imo.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email