IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 10 May 2013 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C2A21F8B54 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.792
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.792 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.507, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bmCBkncgJ9NT for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B9F21F8B33 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UareV-0007MO-8w for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 18:02:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 18:02:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UareV-0007MO-8w@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UareK-0007Le-SC for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 18:02:32 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UareD-0005wa-Qi for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 18:02:31 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e11so4222239wgh.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/x/StVv1Ok4Eh9nUI9ahwIPFKfNRhvn4WAAchDrEbJk=; b=vV/3WZE+Fiff1IsSopMtTQwAdLCM034MxAFvZl9JLkqqO9HDyJtZ8vRnsiUguMRKPT LdjKVkyeyl9DsjAo2WDaRrtBoH5wxWBQX0kRufwykGtV6/Vx8WOYKNBrd9Z98CTGD3Js nqmzrLh9LIyuN1TkGYHrJesz0cvQXCV5PkpYWSICPmiCcZd+qgTBqJUDPB0YL4ROG5Kb 06QS78jo+737v0o284DD9qaTTn084h5CJfJL0nnCFVZsQ287MefjyUF7xLZmxTP9/gTB IpB8CBHSuhGTB1eFcT3G6OA8LYsm5feZ6eUAHzEAzVr+cQ6JdMoaOb6M3nvLUuS+TsVR y22w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.189.41 with SMTP id gf9mr5392268wic.32.1368208460769; Fri, 10 May 2013 10:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.102 with HTTP; Fri, 10 May 2013 10:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4WUYgfu=rcji-bdxNPsE9KCE4T67+vN9b0iojnvycx5R-StA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbcfTjN5QFFuGm-P-rQMpAR3FGSC58WCy3qKn+29YCjn+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYiwNSzvrY1LF_Sex_82TSDwMbTvYqo7LyKfBAOu0j4pfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbdqnH0JK-UaMiaR5rLvZo8txywEcXXSUXa_y95hrLC5yA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7Rbd-VfTFYurZ-JEKjHKOeKvZCKoYLGMXf+0mi-_wbdKYqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgfu=rcji-bdxNPsE9KCE4T67+vN9b0iojnvycx5R-StA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 10:54:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX=AemYGrBzWGX1VEUgKKrk+hR6YV0jg9qVMSdPiimBAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.47; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f47.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.644, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UareD-0005wa-Qi cf3ea2d57af10b3d78a9ba664ba30e7a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnX=AemYGrBzWGX1VEUgKKrk+hR6YV0jg9qVMSdPiimBAA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17921
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 10 May 2013 10:40, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
> [...] are we going to move forward with the frame
> continuation bit?

I think that this was implicit in our decision to limit frames to
65535 bytes (or less).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email