IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 05 November 2020 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8533A0E2A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 01:46:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3SyfXyDDGm4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 01:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F05BC3A171F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 01:46:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kabnv-0001ed-B4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 09:43:39 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 09:43:39 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kabnv-0001ed-B4@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1kabnt-0001dr-TS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 09:43:37 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1kabns-0003kv-07 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 09:43:37 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1604569403; bh=s1CAC+mlgaABlsWVgERz2RHXPibIPTdoDqBRyF82B00=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=bIq57k60NYxyGflqRMKbW0i1ebTTHBnNyNS+r8zdBkUUkz1fBTe5cXyhAdER3gFys i7jLZTVg/ARtIsi9635Wu6v4As7xMv3tiPHn1Aa5RKcbyJiS1WEE5D3tf8XfZiT7PX A0BHTmninMYDWMWRBcIP/haDobsd15S5W2Xj3iBg=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.236] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N8XTv-1kEBDe1iYD-014XUj for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:43:23 +0100
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <F0556EC2-D5AD-47FF-A780-15949F57A911@mnot.net> <8AE9002C-78DE-41E6-8D5E-C2FAF76A3A3B@bzfx.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <a09e0f19-f1ca-1e70-05d6-f59f4fe06cec@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:43:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8AE9002C-78DE-41E6-8D5E-C2FAF76A3A3B@bzfx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Ni5RP+VzLCGLxWexHPJFit/vvXu69xG/xhYWEah3K1L5tOtFKrm W/JIzN6kxNFvacrvlpr1M7dgzJeZR2JZHdJ0aUqwkwUShfYwdc+Anm1loBukYBSjn8OOsvp IoAaN5qSckGo4ifj+Q7EZrH7ETwjq1KZc6QQ25/aob0T4d/7I+XGxxOVvlDILD2OFs93ntt GUrmsogjCKpmkLciR7oKA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:+KGCZJmrmRQ=:nkqTFwMkCMD5e38d7wAm8l ffgLOnsuJ6h9/H8qyRRGG/Zqs4axK0g7fLvEX/QXnV89lW9tIhv9o5wHbiiPleOIOeM05L+Qh gZDrD63CJaub2N//cRgZ5h2+1w8fbX5Qo507fbmx+aKgq0vQ29dThlaxdK7xumooh9Fk5p2tV rvEk/rdiK9y3Giw6D2c3Jq+WjSHWwoQr8yaWDyebBTU8ZhL5W+VuNUXkIqMEGJudcxrbsmnMW W/m1Pvl//tGJABD8o5eKdg3eSyOafrj4Xnpv8iBd2zgNK1NEA+4MfO2wNKtwCH56JaZFb9OnO J0XhH0wLVNHvAt4ex0BcpzspjZyUtTDtedBljmctD/6pFbd6S/Kazfbx70GCXqmDWyI/CBgel l/QF1RSsIaeQxNbJk9wIDdpPZpWhz9vm2TmyavhHuPA1QzNbB0Io3LmTvSV7rkO93qEvTiz12 HL6w37Eu2lBJ/fkmIULSj7PbOwQvA09LyCRaHLJkktOHVZEo3bdOe+Ie8z4JkZ9xzivahDfHm 7F3aHhi10yPTepiE/vEDiw0wkZY1mRugkzMQYfRY9zWEfpNVpFvAhoYBWoMmOLa1jtFslHhQx QBKgJLmY84/G5gtSIGgD6YzHVeuCse9KlJdHOuHWD8Wwz7lAR1xpyr6dzLWkEl98OHN3hR0bQ aApOqID1lQXH6F3ZNugX7U3FWNuGyHo0pwm/MDgjaqPzS4mdtwOgVV+qL1ctY8jHdEk7LW4yL YYCa7s0kCsUUK3RNCjiRLBU4yW9HENmZXVHQkwIN9Ug6VcF4BayclSx0VCGpgpoOHeJXQP9N+ u0fBktizV4t0fF5T+d9OyLKkU+RhhdLum/IQv5WvOX7RbaStB3NgxuWwGt5Q0fzsn32BcmJQz X8aadLIIqfxrUeBRauFQ==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1kabns-0003kv-07 07ef76f543874224efb8dbca364a4952
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/a09e0f19-f1ca-1e70-05d6-f59f4fe06cec@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38173
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 04.11.2020 um 21:40 schrieb Austin Wright:
> ...
> I’m very much in favor of a safe variation of POST.
>
> However,
>
>> for backwards compatibility with existing WebDAV implementations, SEARCH requests that use the text/xml or application/xml content types MUST be processed per the requirements established by [RFC5323  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5323>].
>
> I think this is too restrictive. If it’s not possible to relax the
> RFC5323 requirements, I would favor using REPORT instead.
> ...

We can relax the requirement to apply only to */xml which has a document
element in the "DAV:" namespace (see
<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc5323.html#rfc.section.2.2.2>, or
even restrict it to the two element names defined there).

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email