IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method

Philippe Mougin <pmougin@acm.org> Wed, 18 November 2020 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD8C3A0B98 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:17:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5KWxrIvoEPx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:17:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AB883A0B97 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:17:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kfTqe-0004PG-Jf for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:14:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:14:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kfTqe-0004PG-Jf@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <pmougin@acm.org>) id 1kfTqd-0004Od-Gz for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:14:35 +0000
Received: from smtp03.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.125] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <pmougin@acm.org>) id 1kfTqb-0005qM-1M for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:14:35 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([86.252.35.207]) by mwinf5d57 with ME id twEK2300C4U951A03wEKnq; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 21:14:20 +0100
X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.13]
X-ME-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 21:14:20 +0100
X-ME-IP: 86.252.35.207
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-7ED6C3A1-A669-451E-B448-086D4610364E"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Philippe Mougin <pmougin@acm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 21:14:19 +0100
Message-Id: <5C86F8CE-3075-48C7-BFA0-B7E202225829@acm.org>
References: <F0556EC2-D5AD-47FF-A780-15949F57A911@mnot.net>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Philippe Mougin <pmougin@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <F0556EC2-D5AD-47FF-A780-15949F57A911@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17G80)
Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=80.12.242.125; envelope-from=pmougin@acm.org; helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1kfTqb-0005qM-1M dc6cfe4f8ea7a796a36386e2ec30b3ce
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/5C86F8CE-3075-48C7-BFA0-B7E202225829@acm.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38233
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello,

I don't support adoption because:

- The introduction provides an inaccurate and self contradictory description of GET, as detailed in this message: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2020JulSep/0198.html

- The name of the method appears too restrictive, as a safe and idempotent equivalent to POST, which is what the draft essentially defines, would be useful beyond search operations.

I would support the adoption if the introduction was amended and the draft was extended beyond providing a SEARCH method to something more generic, such as, for instance, a COMPUTE method.

Best,

Philippe Mougin

> Le 4 nov. 2020 à 02:10, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> a écrit :
> 
> As discussed in the October 202 Interim, this is a Call for Adoption for the HTTP SEARCH method draft:
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-search-method-02
> 
> Please indicate whether you support adoption in response to this e-mail; information about intent to implement (or use) it is also useful.
> 
> The Call for Adoption will end on 18 November 2020.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark and Tommy
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email