Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 09 June 2020 04:33 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADDC3A08BB
for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 21:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=aCZZBBV4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=lrJJlt6a
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 6cx9QBymgH-B
for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 8 Jun 2020 21:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D8C3A08AC
for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 21:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>)
id 1jiVtg-00041L-Jd
for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:30:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:30:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jiVtg-00041L-Jd@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76])
by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <mt@lowentropy.net>)
id 1jiVtf-00040U-5k
for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:29:59 +0000
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24])
by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <mt@lowentropy.net>)
id 1jiVtd-0000JY-DJ
for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:29:58 +0000
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42])
by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C6E7E2
for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52])
by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:29:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net;
h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to
:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=h+1RLqx2YQi6NmkRLmeXnbXy/aU3FgT
4TkuEvLhxIgc=; b=aCZZBBV4oTawxdRt5UXFKN2NSxsT8ug8hcgeZ3vvYHp1Wfm
9WfC0+s2SIPhyML0yTT7ORWDQJaiFcymQ2qaiGb0cnCXlj7phF+wQ/QZnVCMR9kk
aQcPYeZvVpsOUt/mWudp5k7YPigTf7LApuGN+VOvOf7jGeuQs1lq8bVOXDtAQ8Q8
YyLBV3CdlpaCxX1Kcj2zD6bnvOr29vf7c56iVK+MpgOjTDCXIMMN+QndAgrUk7cZ
6aTFRSLO7KiLnq5x794i64hGkXv+Mz3/0MBYTFgJYTmtGBZiqLy5EXOKIWo5V1l/
X+G0N7f29LfQ9A1FNmrFf+isOKHsCpnqm2ULrjA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy
:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=h+1RLq
x2YQi6NmkRLmeXnbXy/aU3FgT4TkuEvLhxIgc=; b=lrJJlt6aX0SYKYONYh+vZf
Tl8O9IZ8MbLkaUnD9UArliXnT7uR4rMxMpfWzdIizqH3ffEjMRg0ogfmf0Um1WFw
LzNvvCCFnt3n6XMfHGXDgWUbnfyaWrINn9ltVHuR2nO+YGO3Zmn269oD7tmSZo1a
m465wHob8jh+3hyF8vMruBgdH4hqoxhQJBtLJHFlgURGyuArXiD/tdEAG5ZmWfG5
mEee1uiJ9HVs609TmqViEEHGOts14UXlXuweq02DpzDgNjjL8sUwG+MbqFaCeyuK
Ns3dOFTLjKn3QVUQhFfAkpfBHD8BcOci+kU615yBblko8QPC+bArcvwi+h8ZT3dA
==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:NxDfXurertHF5OIqfC6MRp0STWpA835UwykZ346LdfIkpDudVJ32Tw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehfedgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd
ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho
figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekteeuieektdekleefke
evhfekffevvdevgfekgfeluefgvdejjeegffeigedtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv
pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvg
ht
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:NxDfXspBaRfDhTU77GomuAoTRsCiTb8-7r_bBGof0gklPwmiVTJ7Cg>
<xmx:NxDfXjPXhFIfei6ce2y1IqyfEmx0nxLNQwAba-D72ZC7IIyVdSUOKg>
<xmx:NxDfXt7ezl0u_u62lXlXuL4kJvQvsyGOF9oPl87i2gPD_i-aXpX6hw>
<xmx:NxDfXoLZxYqiXUd6fWXx3ng3te3jnFYDd6N3EfVT0lGdqcIi_u5_ag>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9E446E00A9; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:29:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-519-g0f677ba-fm-20200601.001-g0f677ba6
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <67ff4c81-82a7-42ab-a5ff-d4bc2b8f6fbb@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CANatvzwSpSHd7kZD-4tyMGkBJDdCBi6r_pLBvnaT8rrQy6SBHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:
<CALGR9obRjBSADN1KtKF6jvFVzNS1+JzaS0D0kCVKHKkd4sn+MQ@mail.gmail.com>
<459C86F8-A989-4EF4-84DC-3568FF594F36@apple.com>
<CANatvzwSpSHd7kZD-4tyMGkBJDdCBi6r_pLBvnaT8rrQy6SBHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:29:24 +1000
From: "Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=mt@lowentropy.net; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1jiVtd-0000JY-DJ a74b9ea9dac874a6c4e7a8b1a4addbee
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/67ff4c81-82a7-42ab-a5ff-d4bc2b8f6fbb@www.fastmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37734
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, at 14:04, Kazuho Oku wrote: > Based on these points, my preference is starting to lean towards *not* > having reprioritization as an indispensable feature of Extensible > Priorities. This seems sensible. The "extensible" part is helpful here. While we might not need to relying on the priorities part being extensible, we know that the protocol is. We don't really lose anything by decoupling this part of the spec, but we might gain some certainty.
- Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Yoav Weiss
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Patrick Meenan
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Yoav Weiss
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Eric Kinnear
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Kazuho Oku
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Martin Thomson
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Bence Béky
- Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Exte… Lucas Pardue
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Patrick Meenan
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Patrick Meenan
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Lucas Pardue
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Kinuko Yasuda
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Kinuko Yasuda
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Kazuho Oku
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Yoav Weiss
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Martin Thomson
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Kazuho Oku
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Stefan Eissing
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Yoav Weiss
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Stefan Eissing
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Yoav Weiss
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Stefan Eissing
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Yoav Weiss
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Patrick Meenan
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Yoav Weiss
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Patrick Meenan
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Kazuho Oku
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Yoav Weiss
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Barry Pollard
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Barry Pollard
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Kazuho Oku
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Yoav Weiss
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Lucas Pardue
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Tom Bergan
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Lucas Pardue
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Tom Bergan
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: … Lucas Pardue
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Patrick Meenan
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Patrick Meenan
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
- Reprioritization - implementation intent Mark Nottingham
- Re: Reprioritization - implementation intent Eric Kinnear
- Nice to have guidance (was: Re: Reprioritization … Lucas Pardue
- Re: Nice to have guidance (was: Re: Reprioritizat… Eric Kinnear
- Re: Reprioritization - implementation intent Yoav Weiss
- Re: Reprioritization - implementation intent Yoav Weiss
- Re: Reprioritization - implementation intent Yoav Weiss