IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 09 June 2020 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADDC3A08BB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 21:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=aCZZBBV4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=lrJJlt6a
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6cx9QBymgH-B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 21:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D8C3A08AC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 21:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jiVtg-00041L-Jd for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:30:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:30:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jiVtg-00041L-Jd@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mt@lowentropy.net>) id 1jiVtf-00040U-5k for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:29:59 +0000
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mt@lowentropy.net>) id 1jiVtd-0000JY-DJ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:29:58 +0000
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C6E7E2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:29:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=h+1RLqx2YQi6NmkRLmeXnbXy/aU3FgT 4TkuEvLhxIgc=; b=aCZZBBV4oTawxdRt5UXFKN2NSxsT8ug8hcgeZ3vvYHp1Wfm 9WfC0+s2SIPhyML0yTT7ORWDQJaiFcymQ2qaiGb0cnCXlj7phF+wQ/QZnVCMR9kk aQcPYeZvVpsOUt/mWudp5k7YPigTf7LApuGN+VOvOf7jGeuQs1lq8bVOXDtAQ8Q8 YyLBV3CdlpaCxX1Kcj2zD6bnvOr29vf7c56iVK+MpgOjTDCXIMMN+QndAgrUk7cZ 6aTFRSLO7KiLnq5x794i64hGkXv+Mz3/0MBYTFgJYTmtGBZiqLy5EXOKIWo5V1l/ X+G0N7f29LfQ9A1FNmrFf+isOKHsCpnqm2ULrjA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=h+1RLq x2YQi6NmkRLmeXnbXy/aU3FgT4TkuEvLhxIgc=; b=lrJJlt6aX0SYKYONYh+vZf Tl8O9IZ8MbLkaUnD9UArliXnT7uR4rMxMpfWzdIizqH3ffEjMRg0ogfmf0Um1WFw LzNvvCCFnt3n6XMfHGXDgWUbnfyaWrINn9ltVHuR2nO+YGO3Zmn269oD7tmSZo1a m465wHob8jh+3hyF8vMruBgdH4hqoxhQJBtLJHFlgURGyuArXiD/tdEAG5ZmWfG5 mEee1uiJ9HVs609TmqViEEHGOts14UXlXuweq02DpzDgNjjL8sUwG+MbqFaCeyuK Ns3dOFTLjKn3QVUQhFfAkpfBHD8BcOci+kU615yBblko8QPC+bArcvwi+h8ZT3dA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:NxDfXurertHF5OIqfC6MRp0STWpA835UwykZ346LdfIkpDudVJ32Tw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehfedgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekteeuieektdekleefke evhfekffevvdevgfekgfeluefgvdejjeegffeigedtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvg ht
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:NxDfXspBaRfDhTU77GomuAoTRsCiTb8-7r_bBGof0gklPwmiVTJ7Cg> <xmx:NxDfXjPXhFIfei6ce2y1IqyfEmx0nxLNQwAba-D72ZC7IIyVdSUOKg> <xmx:NxDfXt7ezl0u_u62lXlXuL4kJvQvsyGOF9oPl87i2gPD_i-aXpX6hw> <xmx:NxDfXoLZxYqiXUd6fWXx3ng3te3jnFYDd6N3EfVT0lGdqcIi_u5_ag>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9E446E00A9; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:29:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-519-g0f677ba-fm-20200601.001-g0f677ba6
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <67ff4c81-82a7-42ab-a5ff-d4bc2b8f6fbb@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANatvzwSpSHd7kZD-4tyMGkBJDdCBi6r_pLBvnaT8rrQy6SBHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALGR9obRjBSADN1KtKF6jvFVzNS1+JzaS0D0kCVKHKkd4sn+MQ@mail.gmail.com> <459C86F8-A989-4EF4-84DC-3568FF594F36@apple.com> <CANatvzwSpSHd7kZD-4tyMGkBJDdCBi6r_pLBvnaT8rrQy6SBHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:29:24 +1000
From: "Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=mt@lowentropy.net; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1jiVtd-0000JY-DJ a74b9ea9dac874a6c4e7a8b1a4addbee
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/67ff4c81-82a7-42ab-a5ff-d4bc2b8f6fbb@www.fastmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37734
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, at 14:04, Kazuho Oku wrote:
> Based on these points, my preference is starting to lean towards *not* 
> having reprioritization as an indispensable feature of Extensible 
> Priorities.

This seems sensible.

The "extensible" part is helpful here.  While we might not need to relying on the priorities part being extensible, we know that the protocol is.  We don't really lose anything by decoupling this part of the spec, but we might gain some certainty.

v2.3.2 | Report a Bug | By Email