IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 10 February 2016 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D691A1A0162 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:35:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qFGHw2Zx0FPL for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:35:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84CA01A0167 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:35:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aTQB2-00047E-JP for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:31:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:31:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aTQB2-00047E-JP@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1aTQAw-00046S-L6 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:31:02 +0000
Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1aTQAt-0005Gb-B5 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:31:01 +0000
Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 9so14219422iom.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:30:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bVjtPT/upGa146Y2YjEEPuobgXiPJ21E923uZ9YUX9Q=; b=ReY+0DaoyyIw5qJvTFZUGSn8AU3yondK37w/iWSf3L+6SMJguRKqBe5IgGqxZXJot6 LA0PwgBSroj5ClPfZUSFWZn6/7wC2Cr50eY9Iy8KftcbijWs5MeWMAAYd2BMZTmjhbcx 2ocPimymEnnHoaJ6MKDNB1BvlblJ/5rEXHU4jBPVV2lI3EHjGWdRMG+Yh4eOSYJ/vy5V EokepoqFc4ouKgdVnpAe1GEp+9Hh5zq1VTN+h+7MRI/l1VPVv0UZX6N00izNpal2827Q qbo85eau5ZvLHaZpreuyPI6v/NC2Sq5SS0dIlqCXnFMP5GKRTk/gHE1hHvL1YmkUO8Uk b4dw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bVjtPT/upGa146Y2YjEEPuobgXiPJ21E923uZ9YUX9Q=; b=Y6zSNT1e7cKWTnNVu4qjme5iQ6HJSuTeJ7LPkozCDGkxAOAxGD40MAPm4K9IBzHAop dU/+/SZVRn+Wtt3JBC4baBMB9naogUkEU8k3D2Sf8dodk7tkC/gCUhaIrtgeQjjkP7KW Nvwjr4J8Zje5D0BN/mJKQU1bAZaFpEb+bgHta34YVZDx9+78G2lkRW+hdCHacO3vOQqY stDRiWur8CNi0Vb/k7sqWCeKXxGXJWnFVJTBNUfxnrgk8ZV1jLRHV03OZJA08Q3YSp/z mhwpoGfB8pivsvRnN4m+51oyhD8sunSLt+6gA09dKDf//EwCtTfNWodD0CC5e9zKOvJo B8/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORkz5VrXY7x5sPvjSIPzq6ZFKlBrhodxaNR5A3xeBTvQgknu1BsM/nB3hFT+zuOG/F/OLCzuUm5iDm4hg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.16.153 with SMTP id 25mr38413636ioq.100.1455093033144; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:30:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.53.79 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:30:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B7164F24-DDA1-4753-8A8B-04809B1965FF@mnot.net>
References: <20160209074851.32332.24065.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20160209182822.C37A959F@welho-filter2.welho.com> <B7164F24-DDA1-4753-8A8B-04809B1965FF@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:30:32 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVfZu5e1fOAOAgaxPR=mRS+xv+oDFN1gHRUFamEk_=VtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.182; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-io0-f182.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.835, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aTQAt-0005Gb-B5 420c5bb3520bb6b82da557512f3bcc02
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVfZu5e1fOAOAgaxPR=mRS+xv+oDFN1gHRUFamEk_=VtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31067
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 10 February 2016 at 14:31, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> This is difficult to specify; one way we could do it is to specify the way we know here (using HTTPS with a strong cert), and require other ways to update this specification (with an Updates: field on the Standards Track).


This seems reasonable.  If h2c starts to see wider deployment, then a
good definition for that that assurance might look like will have to
emerge (or alt-svc won't be used there).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email