Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> Wed, 04 March 2015 19:15 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBCF1A87B0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:15:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b3NdR1Bagd5m for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7431F1A87AA for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YTEjq-00018f-G4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:13:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YTEjq-00018f-G4@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1YTEjm-00017r-2L for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:13:42 +0000
Received: from jay.w3.org ([128.30.52.169]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1YTEjm-0002yR-0L for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:13:42 +0000
Received: from ylafon by jay.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1YTEjl-0008S6-R3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:13:41 -0500
X-Return-path: <>
X-Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by jay.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) id 1YRDsy-0005Gy-Hj for ylafon@jay.w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:54:52 -0500
X-Received: from frink.w3.org ([128.30.52.56]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) id 1YRDsy-0000CV-E6 for ylafon@w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 05:54:52 +0000
X-Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) id 1YRDsy-00018K-7A for ylafon@w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 05:54:52 +0000
X-From_: demianbrecht@gmail.com Fri Feb 27 05:54:48 2015
X-Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <demianbrecht@gmail.com>) id 1YRDsu-00017h-Pi for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 05:54:48 +0000
X-Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <demianbrecht@gmail.com>) id 1YRDst-0000BK-Qb for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 05:54:48 +0000
X-Received: by ierx19 with SMTP id x19so26399221ier.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:54:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=/L9W8ZH6xtlWXUU/rhpLpfn65NuXZbr1ErD/eJ5uS04=; b=faFhJYQi4iqiRA1EjVRmISiGVVf6PUvz5dOL8C4Ja2IDX8UgD3KmRxuQ8VEUzrAoHn HwOvwyuHVKX+SEbFj2++BKB4JL0ok1OLrnXQuSBt9Zw/hnfMygxNr6IA9sRBnjTg/geg biG6YKGh9qkv37lKJJwQ2IZ7Fxct1SAH6ioUBoBNUVW+f2c1adGLUkfGh1lbLU+iZVuN izn/dO1KwbNQaNIE3pQjepbhymItYegkt0LxLYo2XFcmz1EJMuoaHNi1MGn/+FDFz3e7 n2lhmhBA3bmq0/6GpVHziC4QGwv193rBiENu3upLeNC6xn32VzIl8zOj0fde9rm0CRPA sMMg==
X-Received: by 10.50.93.70 with SMTP id cs6mr857849igb.6.1425016462091; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:54:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: from darthballs.vf.shawcable.net (S0106e89a8f0b1a84.vf.shawcable.net. [96.48.57.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i20sm659163igh.16.2015.02.26.21.54.20 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:54:21 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_355AC92E-1023-426E-BB48-2C1CD2813902"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b5
From: Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A815F695-E6DF-416E-992C-899EC4FD9641@mnot.net>
Old-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:53:48 -0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <6DBAA8FD-6354-4FBC-969A-1E485DAEC9B7@gmail.com>
References: <20150227052622.BD23A181B3D@rfc-editor.org> <A815F695-E6DF-416E-992C-899EC4FD9641@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.169; envelope-from=demianbrecht@gmail.com; helo=mail-ie0-f169.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YRDst-0000BK-Qb cd99836f47fcb84b5b07498953d2201e
Old-X-Envelope-To: ietf-http-wg
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 05:54:52 +0000
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Feb 27 00:54:53 2015
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9996
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 242311 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 54f006ad202781804284693
ReSent-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:13:38 -0500
ReSent-From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
ReSent-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
ReSent-Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
ReSent-User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/6DBAA8FD-6354-4FBC-969A-1E485DAEC9B7@gmail.com>
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28885
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> On Feb 26, 2015, at 9:36 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > I think Roy wrote this text, but from my standpoint, it's REJECT -- Content-Length defines message length under these conditions no matter what the UA should or should not do. My interpretation is that this alludes that it is valid for a user agent to specify a the size of a representation of a resource even though in practice, such information resides solely with and is sent in outbound messages from the origin server. I’m looking to simply remove the need for interpretation (albeit minor as the following paragraph /does/ clarify) for future readers.
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Willy Tarreau
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Amos Jeffries
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Roy T. Fielding
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (4281) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Demian Brecht
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Demian Brecht