IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 27 May 2010 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BCD3A69B8 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 01:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.500, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AMJOre9rf3DF for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 01:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F3713A68BC for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 01:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 May 2010 08:49:22 -0000
Received: from p508FFB57.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.251.87] by mail.gmx.net (mp044) with SMTP; 27 May 2010 10:49:22 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19MhYImmcZMgdx0mHi/1Zm8Js1804RhvvmvfoVlVd rdEu9/85TqoMYS
Message-ID: <4BFE320B.2090702@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:49:15 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100523104659.05fcea60@elandnews.com> <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37305A2FC3CC1@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37305A2FC3CC1@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 08:49:34 -0000

On 23.05.2010 23:59, L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
> Feedback on an IETF working group internet draft goes to the IETF workgroup. Period. Feedback to whatwg that is not seen by the working group is not helpful to the draft or process. Remove mention of whatwg.
>
> As for copies of documents being obsolete - checking a work-in-progress 'drafty draft' before emailing comments might be suggested, but really it would be necessary to push copies through the IETF drafts announcement process far more frequently.
>
> Is the IETF just rubberstamping this work not under its control, or is this work actually done in this working group? It looks like the former.
> ...

By becoming the editor of an IETF Working Group draft, Ian has agreed to 
follow the Working Group rules. At least I suppose so.

In any case, members of the WG have complained about some editorial 
aspects of the -00 draft. Maybe Ian is waiting for direction from the 
chairs with respect to this?

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email