Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00
Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Mon, 24 May 2010 18:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F18D3A6EF6 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.157
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.466, BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aLeoRECGLM0R for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.221.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F703A6EE2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so6153941qyk.13 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.95.5 with SMTP id b5mr3278718qan.395.1274724261891; Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm3416339qwe.25.2010.05.24.11.04.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so4056399iwn.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.150.2 with SMTP id w2mr4882919ibv.37.1274724258307; Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.60.4 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 11:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37305A2FC3CC1@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100523104659.05fcea60@elandnews.com> <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37305A2FC3CC1@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:03:58 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTin9Llyz2Ejbqk7iVtuHTSTeN2xSAFN8ATUbIxtV@mail.gmail.com>
To: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 18:04:33 -0000
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:59 PM, <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote: > Feedback on an IETF working group internet draft goes to the IETF workgroup. Period. Feedback to whatwg that is not seen by the working group is not helpful to the draft or process. Remove mention of whatwg. I usually try not to get involved in process discussions, but I thought it might be helpful to say a bit about the benefits of involving the whatwg in the process. Generally, the whatwg mailing list has a higher ratio of technical content to meta-discussion, which means it's more approachable for developers who don't normally participate in standards. For example, I've encouraged various members of the WebKit community to raise their concerns and questions about HTML5 in the whatwg instead of on public-html because, historically, I've found that they get friendlier, more productive responses, which encourages them to participate further. If we exclude the whatwg, we're likely to miss out on these points of view. Although folks like you and I can handle participating in this forum, there's a group of folks who find this sort of forum intimidating and unwelcoming. Of course, another solution is to encourage folks on this list to be friendlier and more welcoming. One way to start down that road is to avoid speaking in absolutes or the imperative. Adam
- [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00 SM
- Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00 L.Wood
- Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00 Adam Barth
- Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00 L.Wood
- Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00 SM
- Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00 Sander Striker
- Re: [hybi] draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00 Julian Reschke
- [hybi] Venue of discussion, was: draft-ietf-hybi-… Julian Reschke