Re: [hybi] Multiplexing in WebSocket (Was: HyBi Design Space)

"Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org> Wed, 14 October 2009 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@jay.w3.org>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DB128C14F for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMBu1xeh+bNJ for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32B63A68DF for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=yarukinai) by jay.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mike@jay.w3.org>) id 1My0yl-0007sm-16; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:21:12 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:21:05 +0900
From: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20091014102102.GH29862@sideshowbarker>
References: <4ACE50A2.5070404@ericsson.com> <3a880e2c0910081600v3607665dp193f6df499706810@mail.gmail.com> <4ACF4055.6080302@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910092116010.21884@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AD2E353.8070609@webtide.com> <4AD2F43D.6030202@ninebynine.org> <4AD39A64.4080405@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910132335390.25383@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AD5A2FA.5030805@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AD5A2FA.5030805@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/r6027+poontang (2009-09-22 23:29:11+09:00)
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Multiplexing in WebSocket (Was: HyBi Design Space)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:23:09 -0000

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, 2009-10-14 12:07 +0200:

>  Ian Hickson wrote:
> > ...
> >>> FWIW, so far I've concluded (based on long discussions with a number of 
> >>> developers and implementors) that multiplexing would actually not be that 
> >>> great.
> >> Which developers/implementors?
> > A number of people from various teams at Google and Mozilla in person, and 
> > also on IRC with people from other browser vendors and Web authors who 
> > participate in the WHATWG work.
> > ...
> 
>  If those people do not plan to participate over here, but *do* influence the 
>  spec, then it appears this is a candidate for an Informational RFC, not the 
>  standards track.

Could you elaborate on bit on why that's the case? And/or provide
a URL for the relevant process document where it's explained?

  --Mike

-- 
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/