Re: [hybi] Multiplexing in WebSocket (Was: HyBi Design Space)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 17 October 2009 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227703A686D for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.931, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spPQ+P8dTuCV for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E99623A659C for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2009 09:39:02 -0000
Received: from p508FF6DD.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.246.221] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 17 Oct 2009 11:39:02 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/7Re03jSD7AZxhuSAIDtwpE4RBkK3EEhAwWM7wPW mgNXJr7Ub+NlUI
Message-ID: <4AD990AA.6030306@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:38:50 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
References: <4ACE50A2.5070404@ericsson.com> <3a880e2c0910081600v3607665dp193f6df499706810@mail.gmail.com> <4ACF4055.6080302@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910092116010.21884@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AD05971.7010001@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910132332320.25383@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AD57A41.9070503@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910170936520.9145@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910170936520.9145@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.68
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Multiplexing in WebSocket (Was: HyBi Design Space)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:39:02 -0000

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> So, for clarity, it would probably be good to state in the draft that 
>> this question was considered not to be an issue.
> 
> I don't think it's not an issue. It's an issue like many others. I'm not 
> going to start listing all the things that were considered in the design 
> of the protocol, that'd just be a massive list of things.

Well, earlier on you said:

> FWIW, so far I've concluded (based on long discussions with a number of 
> developers and implementors) that multiplexing would actually not be that 
> great. It could probably only be used for multiplexing to a single 
> websocket path, without making the handshake highly asymmetric or breaking 
> the HTTP compatibility. If it's intended for per-client multiplexing, it 
> can easily be implemented at the application layer, where a much better 
> job can be done that could be done at the protocol layer. If it's intended 
> for multiclient multiplexing, then it's only helping server load, not 
> client performance, and server load isn't especially an issue here.

So it appears that you aware of that drawback, but chose not to address 
this. I still think it would be helpful to document that.

BR, Julian