IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] how do we move forward on agreeing on framing?

"Shelby Moore" <shelby@coolpage.com> Thu, 19 August 2010 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <shelby@coolpage.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6EE3A697B for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.665, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LXM6CpJ9lXyd for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www5.webmail.pair.com (www5.webmail.pair.com [66.39.3.83]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A60E03A69E1 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22165 invoked by uid 65534); 19 Aug 2010 18:36:23 -0000
Received: from 121.97.54.174 ([121.97.54.174]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user shelby@coolpage.com) by sm.webmail.pair.com with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:36:23 -0400
Message-ID: <0def1fd9889864ab5268c3cca301e5be.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:36:23 -0400
From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
To: Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] how do we move forward on agreeing on framing?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shelby@coolpage.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:36:02 -0000

my 0.0000002 cents...

Robert Peon wrote:
> I don't think that is the case since I'm likely to have to load-balance
> millions or billions of connections and not have the ability to modify
> or place interesting requirements on the servers while remaining
> competitive.

Shelby Moore wrote:
> However, we can access probabilities, and thus prioritize [snip]
> so as to reduce conflation errors that accumulate as brittle
> complexity inertia.

Are you designing an orthogonal layer in a protocol stack (correct
engineering), or deciding if YouTube's current server farm architecture is
cost competitive in future?

I am for simplying the base protocol and focusing on getting the basics
correct, such as the transport. (but I don't believe in mob rule so you
can't use my vote officially)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email