Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16
"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Wed, 28 April 2021 01:34 UTC
Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F185F3A0CD1 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 18:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.631, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHh7UedPAsaK for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 18:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1339E3A0CCD for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 18:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id n138so96724337lfa.3 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 18:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UenqAqPAFJIramIjGrlEXR5wGRgDmXbSiKlHTplccvU=; b=lgsf8djbj052cSnBXD+826z0OMDCDC1843b8pUWX0vxdUCTr+M2YNfYYU953nlKNb5 nxG/AgH3c/8EJDoCCKP1mXAHzVRpAZUDmsz+DjpSmDqUhqKAOF1nJqF91P3jJmR+5Bnj /FkHHfrHDh6/Q2qf8PZzCYYrhvp+70CS/3hK5HH/UVM0C+FWCzXnrcd5mmKvc92eiQyt IFKjoo9vsE9eQs08pxJ2l7MLckw3oTLaGadpbSglr+sMvcLKfNghNsW0b4HytTAcN0Ec iMtVpEJFpfhc1u65i0ES2WfEpgjWcrMUuA9GkPTdX2enlsVlpZ8qRk8yakz30K4apzUl UnSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UenqAqPAFJIramIjGrlEXR5wGRgDmXbSiKlHTplccvU=; b=i8Ml54YSwVE+DOG7TO57ntGvqycbUdYMlqO9Ofzh6U+vo7SGBTCsUyDSTTBj5phOi7 KAz0GgwdjXYB2zVv6ds9wKa9ONF3sOj/n/QWB+ywHd7XmsStA9tIk0Q8NLZRzWBC3lC/ i0F5naPoh+F8I7+W+wiv4D803BDqDbt8Hq/eP4b/jGZiBipu6bASInm2yF8Oew92Y5DT EWxZZes3yV23+YMFX2/uKjLq8LADJZW7M5ldLpvZagr5v128XbhDHcu2vX2VoewSOS/6 ldVcgM0urA5e//9zSYl6q71hqzyE6bTLgsUR5SE7osH530hl8yhqUhWE8ssmLpszGYeK yHcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531n/1VzEmsCdm1F9xOtKlVReJpOx9BAWL4exssofy/mXciu3E1K CRqta/q1OeH4tcmAvwMPwVc8bAwr1B6sS1peiZg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiAkhOYd6xfjr1ixBNIYYBBnc5F34pizvWjFo1m5hcwvd0k2XHtLtGrjHSIkO00lWNghsapzmHkvnLeC2JXXY=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a08:: with SMTP id q8mr18587651lfn.12.1619573637380; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 18:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SN6PR13MB23341DC28BD277887FBD69EC85419@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR07MB55468323E303445356630DE3A2419@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB55468323E303445356630DE3A2419@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:33:23 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2Dez87R=mnaaEyfT8q6sUhQqmCV0ADpa4o-NJLJAhQ+xntg@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>, skku-iotlab-members <skku-iotlab-members@googlegroups.com>, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000057fc7705c0fe5fde"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/QQhgHlvChlLIf7Fy3iiLyXwwkxg>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 01:34:05 -0000
Hi Tom, If you have specific comments on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model this week, I will address yours next week. Thanks for your sincere help for our WG drafts. Best Regards, Paul On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:44 AM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote: > From: I2nsf <i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Linda Dunbar < > linda.dunbar@futurewei.com> > Sent: 27 April 2021 16:06 > > I2NSF WG, > > As expected, there is no issue with the second time WGLC for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model. > > <tp> > Sigh, I did not know there was a Last Call in progress, I did not see that > on the datatracker:-( I spent last week going round in circles trying to > dovetail the five I2NSF YANG modules and this morning finally decided that > it could not be done. > > The general concern I have is that there are a number of YANG modules that > are doing the same thing in different ways, with different terminology, > different technology, which is going to give the user heartache IMHO > > Today I read RFC8329 hoping that it would give one clear set of right > terminology but it does not help much; thus s.9.2 therein is rather vague > with question marks in places. The various YANG modules are clearly in the > same ballpark as the RFC but perhaps not on the same base e.g. the RFC has > pass, deny, mirror while this I-D has pass, drop, alert, mirror and > differences like that are repeated many times. In places, that may be by > design but in others I believe that it is not I will post some more > concrete examples on Wednesday. I will seek to use 'capability' as the > base, the refer4ence, and point out where the other four diverge > > I would say that sdn-ipsec gets it right but I also note that the IESG > made in excess of 150 changes to the I-D before approving it which I think > on the one hand was necessary but on the other hand seems a profligate use > of AD time. More could have been done beforehand IMHO. > > Tom Petch > > This email is to confirm that the WGLC for the > draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16 is completed. We will move this > draft to IESG. > > Thank you very much for the work. > > Best Regards, > Linda Dunbar > > From: Linda Dunbar > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 4:37 PM > To: i2nsf@ietf.org > Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16 > > Hello Working Group, > > When I2NSF WG closed the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model > in Dec 2019 ( > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/?q=draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model&f_from=Linda%20Dunbar > ), there was a formative reference to draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-05 which > was stale. > > After the review, IESG decided to throw the draft back to I2NSF WG and > requested the WG to reach the consensus to sunset the > draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-05. The WG finally reached the consensus in > Oct 2020 ( > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/?q=draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model&f_from=Linda%20Dunbar > ) > > > Many thanks to the authors to merge all the relevant content from > draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-05 and addressed all the comments from YANG > Doctor review and > > This email starts a two-weeks Working Group Last Call on > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/ > > This poll runs until April 13, 2021. > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document, please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been > disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you. > > Linda & Yoav > > > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > I2nsf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >
- [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-cap… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… tom petch
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… tom petch
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… tom petch
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… tom petch
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… tom petch
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… tom petch
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… tom petch
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… t petch
- Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong