Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16

"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Thu, 29 April 2021 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37E73A0AE8 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.631, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eO9Jaqi01IyT for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DFF23A0A2D for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id y4so65007111lfl.10 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j5ubqUZoXlA2yNmgsRw76EECILMZ6ShMUl6pCRPeG5s=; b=YX4JwflN0BV5T3Dhz64xGfPewdmMPkmrJuBO1Bevq79zaDBqpDVXqz1Zp0XLCDj1J1 4iwnNH0zmW4VWzm0pPFg8foS/kfuwLVTYDjgUfzCETRA1O9cSaF8tbHlCjrZebtx/zLk s8e/8wMNivdGgb0zE/TcnPHKTelx2yUQ98fDyZUk2UhMR8f2ofdD08Mjzpt2Funm0bs/ g5ey7nuk2kBuf0REoQK+i9LdNDMKIOtUorTy5WoI3ajplrk3hbsTFXXbsXNSOXzj2oce NtzWXt11vHN76wDvdMjhRI3lqp8WuuHGzQ+iOqQo2Isyo1pp8tIacqy9TNR8ES526lH3 E83w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j5ubqUZoXlA2yNmgsRw76EECILMZ6ShMUl6pCRPeG5s=; b=QSb1revsgcr7/0Oj1MLx+zt+C8z8JmM0edwkEzZLiIWYfZljn14W/qtnH8tOSroZof JSzL/8xdBkR1JVTZ4rOReWIYbZ0Ea0fEijvkYFLtXERNRwGWOxegTf/PCclPTJlmDzn6 dLrL4Um56zf5NVeSuKCmOaqmqWfJphZ1DDa4KmpaZl1c1iuBgP+OQpT5PJniRaAAj3CL 4nUfTVF8fxaZaMkmkvlJsqF7NUXsx90XMy+pj/p+W5l0i4I7YkibNtfM3LQMUPF35cqM 405s7vEzo+SeUmfdICFYLMBZzQBGGFnw8GmYi+8QpIUNuTwC+B3Or8jFQr8cDsFW7Q+r Dl8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gkacQ1owyqH54LLAk3EdOlwQA0zEoMQsB0l7EFbZjIJKSHLWU xdntf0stH4xF/TJo5tB+pFWYiQ2WSN8baIYcqJA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy00jHHWQo8vpNyu2wlwi69ufhUXV03QEiS22ra4tDVh2dxenlobgh5Xg2DXp7x+tkrOngONLKFnaShxYI3qTQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4192:: with SMTP id z18mr24602954lfh.19.1619706980365; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SN6PR13MB23341DC28BD277887FBD69EC85419@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR07MB55468323E303445356630DE3A2419@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR13MB23346DE068162527EC61121F85419@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR07MB5546438C0E2EB7C64294E6BCA25F9@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5546438C0E2EB7C64294E6BCA25F9@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 23:35:44 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2Dexj_GwhAYxivNy9=FST+y2T9trp3MKQ4w0oc0Ck927nYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>, Patrick Lingga <patricklink888@gmail.com>, skku-iotlab-members <skku-iotlab-members@googlegroups.com>, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003478d505c11d6ba8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/lMZlDTBGznfFY6GEaAwgpnp01jE>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:36:36 -0000

Hi Tom,
According to your comments, we authors will minimize the usage of range
matches in the revision.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:24 PM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:

> From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
> Sent: 27 April 2021 16:49
> Tom,
>
> Can you please provide the concrete suggestions to the authors on the
> changes you like to see?
>
> <tp>
> Linda
>
> I hope that you are still happy:-)
>
> I thought some more (a bad habit of mine:-) about range and exact values
> and wonder why capability splits them into two separate identity.  This is
> not what the YANG modules say.
>
> The usual way to model this is with a start and end and a comment that if
> only one value is required, then start equals end.  This is widely used
> throughout the IETF and is indeed used in draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec....
> which has the approval of the IESG.
>
> So, since the YANG always AFAICT allows both range and exact value, then
> why split them in capability?  Not wrong, but seems an unnecessary
> complication adding some 25 extra identity.
>
> I can imagine a chip designer saying I can exact match at wire speed but
> not range match; but as I say, that is not what we have in the YANG.  It
> could be in the YANG e.g. as a feature but isn't in any IETF YANG module
> that I know of so chip designers are probably cleverer than I imagine!
>
> Tom Petch
>
> This is the second time of the WGLC for the draft. It would be very
> helpful to hear your suggestions during the WGLC window.
>
> Thank you very much
> Linda
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:44 AM
> To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Closing the WGLC for
> draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>