Re: [i2rs] Results of WG Adoption Call: draft-keyupate-i2rs-bgp-usecases

["Russ White" <[e-mail]>]

> IMHO it would be best to keep BGP specific use cases into a separate
draft.

Okay --so... That leaves us with the next question --the use cases that
aren't BGP centric --do we try and continue a draft with just those one or
two, or... ?? 

I don't really understand what the situation is at this point. My
understanding of the discussion on list and in person from way back were
that the draft I was editing and the BGP use cases draft were going to be
merged, not that one was going to subsume the other completely, leaving the
remainder out of the picture entirely... In fact, the WG originally decided
to only use one use cases draft as it's basis for work until the use cases
in that first draft were covered by requirements/etc. It now sounds like
we've changed that direction completely, and we're back to boiling the
ocean.

I'm a bit confused at this point about when those decisions were changed,
and how we intend to proceed.

:-)

Russ