Re: [i2rs] Results of WG Adoption Call: draft-keyupate-i2rs-bgp-usecases

["Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <[e-mail]>]

Russ,

I am ok with merging of the draft. But do u think merging non-bgp centric
use cases into bgp usecases draft makes sense?

Regards,
Keyur

On 8/15/13 6:20 PM, "Russ White" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>> IMHO it would be best to keep BGP specific use cases into a separate
>draft.
>
>Okay --so... That leaves us with the next question --the use cases that
>aren't BGP centric --do we try and continue a draft with just those one or
>two, or... ?? 
>
>I don't really understand what the situation is at this point. My
>understanding of the discussion on list and in person from way back were
>that the draft I was editing and the BGP use cases draft were going to be
>merged, not that one was going to subsume the other completely, leaving
>the
>remainder out of the picture entirely... In fact, the WG originally
>decided
>to only use one use cases draft as it's basis for work until the use cases
>in that first draft were covered by requirements/etc. It now sounds like
>we've changed that direction completely, and we're back to boiling the
>ocean.
>
>I'm a bit confused at this point about when those decisions were changed,
>and how we intend to proceed.
>
>:-)
>
>Russ 
>
>