Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG Adoption call (2/2 to 2/16/2015) - draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00

Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> Tue, 03 February 2015 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF221A7021 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:52:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uaavQEj1ZdvU for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:52:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87DCA1A802C for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:52:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2007; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422985953; x=1424195553; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Gk8q32zAjXfUrF8HsM4ZdruMKmpJGtBFcFSxZtdZ/E=; b=P+vPaRR6Rvt6YeHnCkhg9PPg0J3YasxgzPkBZHGY/Wc8RJ6YfThA9fOZ +qBGTG83AlIoK5+IdUAWZWydFktCdc/oiXw8oR3Fx9BodU+mr0aPIt3G/ FKss/OxmOVGlSmeXm8FvBhA8qeJim/JunDLU8hKe7E1+RMmBr4b50ae2z I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BCBQCMCtFU/5ldJa1agwZSWcUACoVxAoEeQwEBAQEBfYQMAQEBAwEBAQEaFQEFNgoBEAsOBAYJFg8JAwIBAgEVIg4GAQwBBQIBAQWIHAgN1yoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXjxYQAgFPB4QpBYodjhWBF4UniGSDPSKCMoFaIDEBgkEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,514,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="120167129"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2015 17:52:33 +0000
Received: from [10.117.46.163] (rtp-jclarke-8912.cisco.com [10.117.46.163]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t13HqWJV029934; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:52:32 GMT
Message-ID: <54D10AE0.6070908@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:52:32 -0500
From: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, i2rs@ietf.org
References: <011101d03f43$6b2b6870$41823950$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <011101d03f43$6b2b6870$41823950$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/3a7n7v4u7cAbWM7ObnUWuaQAKck>
Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG Adoption call (2/2 to 2/16/2015) - draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:52:47 -0000

On 2/2/15 6:53 PM, Susan Hares wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for:
> draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00  (2/2 to 2/16/2015).  You can
> access the draft at:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt

Support.  In fact, the traceability draft calls out pub-sub in 7.4.3. 
It would be nice to see this use case mentioned in the Voit draft.

Joe

>
> The current I2RS charter states:
>
> “The I2RS working group works to develop a high-level architecture
> thatdescribes the basic building-blocks necessary to enable the specific
> usecases, and that will lead to an understanding of the abstract
> informational models and requirements for encodings and protocols for
> the I2RS interfaces.”
>
> This draft is part of setting the requirements for the I2RS protocol.
>
> As Andy has noted in early email, there may be nothing specific to I2RS
> in draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt.  It may be something
> that should be just a part of the netconf/restconf functionality.  As
> part of the adoption of this draft, the I2RS chairs would like to hear
> your opinion of Andy’s statement.  Andy also suggests that
> draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should also be part of the I2RS
> requirements.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html
>
> [chair hat-off] IMHO, I think Andy is correct. [chair-hat on ].
>
> If the WG approves adoption of
> draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt and the WG feels these
> drafts should be netmod WG drafts with I2RS holding a requirement
> drafts, the I2RS chairs will do the right thing to make it happen.   If
> enough people comment that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should
> be part of the I2RS requirements, we will do a WG adoption of call for
> this requirement.
>
> Sue Hares
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>