Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG Adoption call (2/2 to 2/16/2015) - draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00

"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Tue, 03 February 2015 00:30 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741B81A871C for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:30:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7LYKp_L5JJzE for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lucidvision.com (unknown [50.255.148.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0561A1B44 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.136] (unknown [50.255.148.177]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE072DA8E72; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 19:30:15 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F5A6A282-728C-490A-819C-F337EB7B8D4A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <011101d03f43$6b2b6870$41823950$@ndzh.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 19:30:15 -0500
Message-Id: <A9F21035-6022-46AD-894C-0EC59D683712@lucidvision.com>
References: <011101d03f43$6b2b6870$41823950$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/vUSHBDY8Azj88KaReERRmq0dxU0>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG Adoption call (2/2 to 2/16/2015) - draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:30:18 -0000

Support.

> On Feb 2, 2015:6:53 PM, at 6:53 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for:  draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00  (2/2 to 2/16/2015).  You can access the draft at: 
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt>
>  
> The current I2RS charter states: 
>  
> “The I2RS working group works to develop a high-level architecture that describes the basic building-blocks necessary to enable the specific use  cases, and that will lead to an understanding of the abstract informational models and requirements for encodings and protocols for the I2RS interfaces.”
>  
> This draft is part of setting the requirements for the I2RS protocol.  
>  
> As Andy has noted in early email, there may be nothing specific to I2RS in draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt.  It may be something that should be just a part of the netconf/restconf functionality.  As part of the adoption of this draft, the I2RS chairs would like to hear your opinion of Andy’s statement.  Andy also suggests that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should also be part of the I2RS requirements. 
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html>
>  
> [chair hat-off] IMHO, I think Andy is correct. [chair-hat on ]. 
>  
> If the WG approves adoption of draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt and the WG feels these drafts should be netmod WG drafts with I2RS holding a requirement drafts, the I2RS chairs will do the right thing to make it happen.   If enough people comment that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should be part of the I2RS requirements, we will do a WG adoption of call for this requirement.  
>  
> Sue Hares
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>