Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG Adoption call (2/2 to 2/16/2015) - draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00

support - it's a good starting point.

On 2 Feb 2015, at 23:53, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for:  draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00  (2/2 to 2/16/2015).  You can access the draft at:
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt
>  
> The current I2RS charter states:
>  
> “The I2RS working group works to develop a high-level architecture that describes the basic building-blocks necessary to enable the specific use  cases, and that will lead to an understanding of the abstract informational models and requirements for encodings and protocols for the I2RS interfaces.”
>  
> This draft is part of setting the requirements for the I2RS protocol. 
>  
> As Andy has noted in early email, there may be nothing specific to I2RS in draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt.  It may be something that should be just a part of the netconf/restconf functionality.  As part of the adoption of this draft, the I2RS chairs would like to hear your opinion of Andy’s statement.  Andy also suggests that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should also be part of the I2RS requirements.
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html
>  
> [chair hat-off] IMHO, I think Andy is correct. [chair-hat on ].
>  
> If the WG approves adoption of draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt and the WG feels these drafts should be netmod WG drafts with I2RS holding a requirement drafts, the I2RS chairs will do the right thing to make it happen.   If enough people comment that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should be part of the I2RS requirements, we will do a WG adoption of call for this requirement.  
>  
> Sue Hares
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs