Re: [i2rs] IETF 91 meeting requested - call for agenda; status reports?

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

Jeff: 

 

Please add to the agenda the following drafts: I2RS yang Data and
Information models for ISIS, OSPF, Basic Network Policy (BNP), PBR and BGP.
PBR and BGP will be uploaded next week after some internal review.   

 

The PBR model is the information model that is a collaboration between the
PBR (draft-kini-i2rs-pbr-info-model-00) and the
(draft-hares-i2rs-policy-info-model).   We hoped to have the agreement on
the text early next week (just 1 technical discussion).   The author team
has had meetings in August and September.   

 

Please add the use case to the agenda. 

 

One question - should I be submitting these I2RS configuration IM/DM as
netmod models? If so, I will do this as well. 

 

Sue 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Dean Bogdanovic
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 2:44 PM
To: Jeffrey Haas
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [i2rs] IETF 91 meeting requested - call for agenda; status
reports?

 

Jeff,

 

To kickstart the discussions

 

looking at what is needed in NETMOD and NETCONF for I2RS

 

datastore for I2RS (use cases for ephemeral data store)

 

working on ACL YANG model - with ACL model available and
draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-15 being fixed, PBR info model
(draft-kini-i2rs-pbr-info-model-00) can be extended into data model. I'll
try to submit the draft by the deadline (it is dependent on new
draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg, probably draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16,
being published)

 

Dean

 

On Sep 25, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Jeffrey Haas < <mailto:[e-mail]>
[e-mail]> wrote:

 

> Your chairs have been a bit over-busy recently with travel to unicast 

> people doing various bits of chartered work.  This means we've been 

> behind on some of our goals in terms of getting regular design 

> sessions running.  I know that at least a couple calls have happened 

> that I've missed that Sue Hares has done, so some progress is being made.

> 

> We've requested a 1 hour time slot for IETF 91 in Honolulu to give us 

> a chance to talk.  This is a call for agenda slots.

> 

> This is also a call for status reports.

> 

> We've had some productive discussion about requests to netmod/netconf, 

> albeit ones that haven't converged yet.

> 

> What have you been up to?

> 

> -- Jeff & Ed

> 

> _______________________________________________

> i2rs mailing list

>  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]

>  <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

 

_______________________________________________

i2rs mailing list

 <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]

 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs