IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] outside the US [was Answers]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 17 March 2018 02:15 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C15126C3D for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e4D5YmrBO5TH for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A34F1250B8 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id d1so4793162pgv.2 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4s2YUOVJ5Ur4nqzSf4ZoeJYa9/bcFFAD+2hZh04L7Jw=; b=PiN+EdljJ4YxON1EdcMrSGImkpQjX3pss2xgMl9H0lJlc8T4ImdD8JFIQKfQVrSbDK BuVDhRIRCZShRGc2VYMJ5QGNosm0tljllKsNdSUeHRG/GlH/SkvQqYVV7nb60yK/sH72 fyC8hNjPnwSlE6tc9Lu6wS+xkDOPSy7cmvDI1SvQxrx+f6U3HwczdkI/gm+zAQ1X9z7W dZHjhBg53ItQo6jFqQ+7n6AswF9Vh8Hb6IOKDikJ9dQJWJ+ntkkg+fTLmFWsA6igSxcn 0ZVStuBbQKMwDQFdSrFWO7L2Y/LgJhajkzEnTkV7oPziK2C1hqoswd9IoEiNi0S8BBsU /gwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4s2YUOVJ5Ur4nqzSf4ZoeJYa9/bcFFAD+2hZh04L7Jw=; b=LuU01ZtWevLUwkQV85Bn+WULE7Ik6YSfMFNs7SyWndaUK16x71VWuDzHvopZXlyOPO DK42rt2RNR2I5VuK8j4Sh/GvJNshC9/xiHs+31anrkw8DKe0OIA1EBmkk3KQO+WCWyHI /VotAnMuwmUm4q2KzbyRyvwzQ03+ehbeeOCrmXOCSIZPvD2BBu0wju5xVcOnPxihBnKh u03wRHwI8zf2hA9HPr2J3d75C2ixdN0QB8Xj5Ul9qComP/F6Z0+ikgoJHC0qJvKPqexa gG9kOkZWgjJXdaXf82jCZL9g9PFgjHY05i3ojsGvwhSFfNpaFHCCpayI6md5SxcIo0xl uzOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GV7tcTRH9IQQbGZq3P9SNP7uyMq5phqvHP/0+JevgUcrqVkeZv bY2RIp9CwkrXAwMUj9FI/a6iYWXG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvoNr5HwcBfkrm0ILO+i4JbtHz2TiF7rJBAy1Ed7Z773roibyh11X3iMd3bDuNvmRQiAlXHUA==
X-Received: by 10.99.96.193 with SMTP id u184mr3257943pgb.103.1521252934179; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([118.148.72.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s89sm16251288pfk.54.2018.03.16.19.15.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, iasa20@ietf.org
References: <20180316211438.mqjf74376cfkhdht@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5cc63d89-dbe9-ebcc-b390-0e62a4f00157@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:15:40 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180316211438.mqjf74376cfkhdht@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/jXHzsySMuKCnMlJLSAS7DlPyVLQ>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] outside the US [was Answers]
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 02:15:37 -0000

On 17/03/2018 10:14, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
...
>> UN & ITU interactions, we will still have ISOC in Geneva. Better not
>> throw that baby out with the bathwater.
> 
> I don't understand what ISOC's offices in Geneva have to do with
> this.  We already determined that ISOC's having of offices there does
> not affect the jurisiction, no?

What I mean is that on occasions where we (the Internet technical
community) desire to be present at UN or ITU sponsored meetings
(such as WSIS/WGIG a few years ago), having a foot on the ground
in the Geneva ecosystem of NGOs and international organisations
is important. ISOC is such a foot on the ground. And yes, it
matters that they are physically in Geneva. That sort of meeting
seems to mainly happen in, or be organised out of, Geneva rather
than New York, especially of course in the case of the ITU.

So the post-IASA2.0 version of RFC 2031 needs to preserve the
option of ISOC speaking for us when necessary. I don't think
this is contentious; I certainly hope not.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email