Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft

["Dirk Kutscher" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for all the feedback so far!

Since we want to talk about the draft in Singapore, it would also be 
great to hear some suggestions for fixes and additions.

Thanks,
Dirk



On 25 Oct 2017, at 6:36, S Samar wrote:

> I agree and support the terminology adoption.
>
> Best Regards
> Samar
>
> Dr. Samar Shailendra
> TCS Research & Innovation
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
>
>
>
> From:   "Dirk Kutscher" <[e-mail]>
> To:     [e-mail]
> Date:   10/24/2017 02:50 PM
> Subject:        [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft
> Sent by:        "icnrg" <[e-mail]>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> the ICNRG Chairs would like to initiate a discussion on the adoption 
> of
> the terminology draft:
>
> Name:                            draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology
> Revision:                03
> Title:                           Information-Centric Networking (ICN): 
> CCN
> and NDN Terminology
> Document date:           2017-09-11
> Group:                           Individual Submission
> Pages:                           18
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03.txt
>
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology/
> Htmlized:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03
> Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03
> Abstract:
>     Information Centric Networking (ICN) is a new paradigm where 
> network
>     communications are accomplished by requesting named content, 
> instead
>     of sending packets to destination addresses.  Named Data 
> Networking
>     (NDN) and Content-Centric Networking (CCN) are two prominent ICN
>     architectures.  This document provides an overview of the
> terminology
>     and definitions that have been used in describing concepts in 
> these
>     two projects.  While there are other ICN architectures, they are 
> not
>     part of the NDN and CCN vision and as such are out of scope for 
> this
>     document.
>
>
>  From the chairs?s perspective, this draft has seen some review in the
> group, and the general feedback suggests that this is useful work.
>
> It?s not quite ready for publication of course, but now could be a
> good time to discuss whether think that this is sufficiently mature,
> aiming at the right content and whether it could become a useful and
> relevant product of ICNRG at some point.
>
> Process-wise, at this point, we are essentially trying to motivate you
> to look into it, share your thoughts on the list or at the meeting at
> IETF-100 where we are going to talk about it. The actual decision will
> be taken after IETF-100, on the mailing list as usual.
>
> Thanks,
> Börje, Dave, Dirk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
>
> =====-----=====-----=====
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you