Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft

Hi all,

I support.

One nit: the ‘x’ in ‘CCNx’ is never defined.

-----Original Message-----
From: icnrg <icnrg-bounces@irtf.org> on behalf of Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
Date: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 5:20 AM
To: <icnrg@irtf.org>
Subject: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft

    Hi all,

    the ICNRG Chairs would like to initiate a discussion on the adoption of 
    the terminology draft:

    Name:		draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology
    Revision:	03
    Title:		Information-Centric Networking (ICN): CCN and NDN Terminology
    Document date:	2017-09-11
    Group:		Individual Submission
    Pages:		18
    URL:         
    https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03.txt
    Status:      
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology/
    Htmlized:    
    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03
    Htmlized:    
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03
    Diff:        
    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03
    Abstract:
        Information Centric Networking (ICN) is a new paradigm where network
        communications are accomplished by requesting named content, instead
        of sending packets to destination addresses.  Named Data Networking
        (NDN) and Content-Centric Networking (CCN) are two prominent ICN
        architectures.  This document provides an overview of the 
    terminology
        and definitions that have been used in describing concepts in these
        two projects.  While there are other ICN architectures, they are not
        part of the NDN and CCN vision and as such are out of scope for this
        document.

     From the chairs’s perspective, this draft has seen some review in the 
    group, and the general feedback suggests that this is useful work.

    It’s not quite ready for publication of course, but now could be a 
    good time to discuss whether think that this is sufficiently mature, 
    aiming at the right content and whether it could become a useful and 
    relevant product of ICNRG at some point.

    Process-wise, at this point, we are essentially trying to motivate you 
    to look into it, share your thoughts on the list or at the meeting at 
    IETF-100 where we are going to talk about it. The actual decision will 
    be taken after IETF-100, on the mailing list as usual.

    Thanks,
    Börje, Dave, Dirk

    _______________________________________________
    icnrg mailing list
    icnrg@irtf.org
    https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg