Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft
Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de> Tue, 24 October 2017 12:07 UTC
Return-Path: <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3247E13F719 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dNG1TOOJ6yYg for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A2013F717 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1e6xzJ-000hPE-T4>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:07:17 +0200
Received: from ze304.pia.fu-berlin.de ([87.77.227.4] helo=mw-x1.zedat.fu-berlin.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1e6xzJ-002gOY-I6>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:07:17 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:07:18 +0200
From: Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
To: Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
cc: icnrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <FBCAC64E-9C95-481D-98B5-59AE789695C5@dkutscher.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1710241407080.18128@mw-x1>
References: <FBCAC64E-9C95-481D-98B5-59AE789695C5@dkutscher.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23)
X-X-Sender: waehl@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="22216191-28647-1508846838=:18128"
X-Originating-IP: 87.77.227.4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/z2RvlSmpKll2JuAJ7N3xInl66Vc>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:07:21 -0000
I support adoption. On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Dirk Kutscher wrote: > Hi all, > > the ICNRG Chairs would like to initiate a discussion on the adoption of > the terminology draft: > > Name: draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology > Revision: 03 > Title: Information-Centric Networking (ICN): CCN and NDN Terminology > Document date: 2017-09-11 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 18 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology/ > Htmlized: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03 > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03 > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03 > Abstract: > Information Centric Networking (ICN) is a new paradigm where network > communications are accomplished by requesting named content, instead > of sending packets to destination addresses. Named Data Networking > (NDN) and Content-Centric Networking (CCN) are two prominent ICN > architectures. This document provides an overview of the > terminology > and definitions that have been used in describing concepts in these > two projects. While there are other ICN architectures, they are not > part of the NDN and CCN vision and as such are out of scope for this > document. > > > From the chairs’s perspective, this draft has seen some review in the > group, and the general feedback suggests that this is useful work. > > It’s not quite ready for publication of course, but now could be a > good time to discuss whether think that this is sufficiently mature, > aiming at the right content and whether it could become a useful and > relevant product of ICNRG at some point. > > Process-wise, at this point, we are essentially trying to motivate you > to look into it, share your thoughts on the list or at the meeting at > IETF-100 where we are going to talk about it. The actual decision will > be taken after IETF-100, on the mailing list as usual. > > Thanks, > Börje, Dave, Dirk > > > _______________________________________________ > icnrg mailing list > icnrg@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg > -- Matthias Waehlisch . Freie Universitaet Berlin, Computer Science .. http://www.cs.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
- [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology … Thomas C. Schmidt
- Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology … Matthias Waehlisch
- Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology … Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology … Mayutan A.
- Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology … Michael Kowal (mikowal)
- Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology … Jungha Hong
- Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology … S Samar
- Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology … Dirk Kutscher