Re: [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft

I support its adoption.

Jungha Hong

________________________________
보낸 사람 : "Dirk Kutscher" <ietf@dkutscher.net>
보낸 날짜 : 2017-10-24 18:20:09 ( +09:00 )
받는 사람 : icnrg@irtf.org <icnrg@irtf.org>
참조 :
제목 : [icnrg] Heads-up: RG adoption of terminology draft

Hi all,

the ICNRG Chairs would like to initiate a discussion on the adoption of

the terminology draft:

Name: draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology

Revision: 03

Title: Information-Centric Networking (ICN): CCN and NDN Terminology

Document date: 2017-09-11

Group: Individual Submission

Pages: 18

URL:

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03.txt

Status:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology/

Htmlized:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03

Htmlized:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03

Diff:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-03

Abstract:

Information Centric Networking (ICN) is a new paradigm where network

communications are accomplished by requesting named content, instead

of sending packets to destination addresses. Named Data Networking

(NDN) and Content-Centric Networking (CCN) are two prominent ICN

architectures. This document provides an overview of the

terminology

and definitions that have been used in describing concepts in these

two projects. While there are other ICN architectures, they are not

part of the NDN and CCN vision and as such are out of scope for this

document.

From the chairs’s perspective, this draft has seen some review in the

group, and the general feedback suggests that this is useful work.

It’s not quite ready for publication of course, but now could be a

good time to discuss whether think that this is sufficiently mature,

aiming at the right content and whether it could become a useful and

relevant product of ICNRG at some point.

Process-wise, at this point, we are essentially trying to motivate you

to look into it, share your thoughts on the list or at the meeting at

IETF-100 where we are going to talk about it. The actual decision will

be taken after IETF-100, on the mailing list as usual.

Thanks,

Börje, Dave, Dirk

_______________________________________________

icnrg mailing list

icnrg@irtf.org

https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg