Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback?
Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Sat, 21 July 2018 13:43 UTC
Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0B3130D7A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R16KLr5y00yb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764A0124C04 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id s24-v6so11924232edr.8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CaipyYQTPXnt4LN5wj7/vUFamOnxwKQXWm0fnj96RAA=; b=UU1m9iqeHYvYRSm+LY7Hdm0FDzb2FdB8c78Y56pYOPJrySTkxaqKA8Qq/Wc68Gjixr fGZX9eaZUaxziMsTwgeCuUlRNLk0hh3+TVOtl7gcKz15LILoXl2UW80QEQXPqjsDeKu2 hVTWsWinjtEJApL+nzTiuGRm9fVIK+PE0gaWFvQuajCDVtIrtF1d3NsnpNruqgaIfvvp WTbrgXKVakHoL01iU8+7sHD/lm7cPYy/AFNmBoaRPZFSmCdwE1KMFY58sv+FgRbsrQeY g4DYgarxUJBAeVxnbvHOY3cv9XTHq8mevGHnEA8fp9RpIICFXcvvmdjUtJUDSrazYX4A xlug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CaipyYQTPXnt4LN5wj7/vUFamOnxwKQXWm0fnj96RAA=; b=keBTvKHWR78F0i1OPnICQeaQfPAT/S7G/0cJ61KTA6bwWSmDRjlZ9uN3BtJ9qM+hMb IHsp303XT/0c854dkc/vhZP8V+2ceYc5jwNkfGUI7T+6ifGS2/tE3YaX6ZwxwgC1D4bu 1cLgts6UOsJ6RiHlbYQak7RzX+soTSU9jgp4AVc9BfLLsVi4mRJEalFSmYneQ+7I4Ay+ ITSQr3wbYLNq8h+4zB8iQqfNKP/GOGhv3mrHX6DrBL7IxcYsg4ehB9KbRXgKyQMI0pzu FXzaiiJQm+zf8vfQjHm6fJjiijyv4V2aLnBcRYngZ9QCpcB0LVSV7vtvvATs4rv9l668 G4jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlE1kA2Hwe8MgjmjTYYKS0SZHotQAIHgI6NGu2yJledi2ZWy0Vzj VQA/Phv9Kt2BpBafPZCl5dGF5g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfzo6aHNlMyTLa+tAgg96F7mQVrKKBNv5FAPVqdCnokikYIlxqvOtQ3XR6mmA+TKI3JtK7c8w==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:8b25:: with SMTP id l34-v6mr6406154edl.265.1532180577788; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vurt.meerval.net (vurt.meerval.net. [192.147.168.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i63-v6sm2173603edi.16.2018.07.21.06.42.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vurt.meerval.net [local]) by vurt.meerval.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 87032769; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:54 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:53 +0000
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180721134253.GA37801@vurt.meerval.net>
References: <1E638585-D2BC-472A-B854-E90660D19ED8@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1E638585-D2BC-472A-B854-E90660D19ED8@juniper.net>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/27e3b48wimw8U42enG_T_-eSGMs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:43:02 -0000
Dear John & Sue, On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 01:29:18PM +0000, John Scudder wrote: > Your comments are welcome either on-list or unicast to the chairs, > about whether you think this is worth repeating or whether you like > the 2.5 hour single session format better. I liked the format. I think the 2 session approach helps counter potential for audience fatigue, but also has other advantages such as easier to get a beverage or biobreak. In corporate context a 2,5 hour meeting is rarely ideal either. Good idea! Kind regards, Job
- [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback? John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback? Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback? Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback? guntervandeveldecc