IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] two-session IDR format feedback?

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Sat, 21 July 2018 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFF1127333; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZYJpw4Ud8w1M; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AED3124C04; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6LDTOac010603; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:29:24 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=WavJMR9sCKBmLnmp+GRl+RBeC4uBPnpebhJKrJ8XSds=; b=w4ox1hqot1VV27Rf5AGyhoHfPNVWl8YwBRf+/3W1TuhxhMOcT8g8IgxI0VRJbUBIfhGW kFJiwlWWj4ZAuYG+tjYc6W0TD9ysIEHPhyxjW0Wbnc20KtTnQsnidN/mjkp4QBlP6Afq 0XmDRSPlxhyvnTkMhiDdT3l0YrcWNtDVEhfZNCKaceRnrjX0fdcAldKY1fDgnNXyVyaW dO54Vu+bJdSXYkTjW3TJKgzuDcxtL9u4QdSwRYpIfepNuQay1Jdu4wCoYgWAJ0tzUnpj diRUJP8s6UAy1Vj98zzRae3fa1wJPcIYbrKknyEQPyeEj2iv7brsclwSUumQnI7xSDfU lg==
Received: from nam01-sn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01lp0119.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.119]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2kc02p8964-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:29:24 -0700
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.27) by BN3PR0501MB1299.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.183.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.995.10; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:29:20 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6553:f7cd:ee7c:12b3]) by BN3PR0501MB1507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6553:f7cd:ee7c:12b3%3]) with mapi id 15.20.0973.018; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:29:18 +0000
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: two-session IDR format feedback?
Thread-Index: AQHUIPbTLIg1wcnCNECKhTyu2xaYuQ==
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:29:18 +0000
Message-ID: <1E638585-D2BC-472A-B854-E90660D19ED8@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1299; 6:I6LxV+/hnbuSquGL++tRWiPHsy4HWju39YmW598fWUbidQ/N69nIx9H4R4HbOEh5gEcmsng5DC7FJXj4Ibgn3YlFAzDWx9fSs4EdqU75dnDCXVMlLm0UNg097i87u/5/amVqaVvmbiLDW336ctBXaDzNZWPZmBF8atBJaaPT53fAJut3JZnY/bk6ei4vm0urTtc2wKvnAkS+ka5lWVGqQy6zPyqEn+Gyvh2Ir2ynPVcY9tp+4Etk1z8ZwkgAaREb4lrTyevBzjwSNBNNuf+vQwy5KOdETraTOdz7RfKg4rIRf5C4Ev8CZ9CMBu0zX5IrodZ6U7jD4T9HfzYTHYTppfJgarCGTBpC9ARU6rYV5694duPtIGIAl1h050Ecki8kwA4a4MwkprE3XLtUD30irwOrG0o3QCQFJCFe/MeEG0U9idoSQHnkIfvbCSfdmGi4P4MicOPeQ2n9JlKROXmUIg==; 5:ViWR/u/jT8WoVpAO9IuC81G3pdC8gtm+SLTinF32jL+Tz0RsesyYvNU9XsWk/EhIGLCcVWi7+Jfxw5v0nAarQAXEBh1L8YITaYtX1PzMTaud4rZUJl4QLRmWsyR0nGrrfl1hwN+hRbCdY59Jq1Ceaag0JubyzlpFolEn7kQyFZ4=; 7:mp/5dH48A+MGRcGl9YW6QIUTvanOgC9MAdDsJZb1veaVU/Mvco0xgbIClgIkmc7kL5GlcgQPPHy+0jxYPq3IRhk0UqaLke9wbIhkvTWxFk7iC/xbME1nhWor63zv5zZOZeTDd7tXkckx9X27VXG6MAskNGiI/LfEF0rXhrci8jBdxgCYvNULijAjX28UkjiF+FFvsd1D/NtlxTsZoPTTIm7m7SejIlmNBbigalINxHwRABdMEzgHhRVC5j0Wopns
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6468f5c1-c8e6-4ed5-39f5-08d5ef0df64e
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989117)(5600073)(711020)(4618075)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1299;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR0501MB1299:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB1299968CE8D72DE981AC4F94AA500@BN3PR0501MB1299.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1299; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1299;
x-forefront-prvs: 074040B844
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(136003)(346002)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(53754006)(486006)(5660300001)(97736004)(66066001)(256004)(6436002)(3480700004)(6486002)(81156014)(68736007)(6506007)(106356001)(26005)(102836004)(83716003)(81166006)(5250100002)(8676002)(25786009)(186003)(82746002)(2900100001)(2906002)(478600001)(3846002)(6116002)(4326008)(450100002)(33656002)(305945005)(36756003)(316002)(99286004)(53936002)(7736002)(2616005)(8936002)(6916009)(105586002)(476003)(14454004)(6512007)(86362001)(42262002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1299; H:BN3PR0501MB1507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: VrwNxSqrmJ1oTeR1LuIYLtaKdJmfKf8qjcJbI9/nEdIgqxH61y0/2CedwA3hHaRvaaQDpIFSqNE6ER4v9jvjnL+j55rcdVDfsQSg32v6Qmcy0Ynt/k0Q6YU8UqAFkm6JM+IIUeS26oozz12E44WzlkaIKdYbmPTu10JZHTaC4L9AyohAMm1GlLRzYt0IYg/uWyzaMSZoFbTKjpKAqPaM/x5rcaLbO2UuNfRFmBo12FuamIFahFGG53C/bfqD1DBAVtwOa2k+5gA1Z7KXXD3gWV+3WUvewErLRJMRpnfXOO3+0MzWigWHSfzKM73CaIQmdqAINvnL3IJQe+hVZwIJS1OJ9vLvoiE0LiYMbn/8T4I=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <56597146B5F70D4084A68F9529475E20@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6468f5c1-c8e6-4ed5-39f5-08d5ef0df64e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Jul 2018 13:29:18.7009 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1299
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-07-21_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807210153
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/YCH8F0Aqs2byaU8s0-qBmBXBp78>
Subject: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:29:28 -0000

Hi All,

Our split meeting this week was an experiment. When Sue and I came up with the idea we'd noticed that we tend to attract topics in clusters (e.g., BGP-LS drafts; SR drafts) and we wondered if everyone really wanted to participate in all of those. One of our goals in splitting the meeting was to find out if folks might consult the agenda and decide to attend one session or the other but not both, based on agenda content. Based on a rough guesstimate of turnout, I'm not confident that happened, although "Friday" is a confounding factor.

We would be interested in the WG's feedback on what you liked, or didn't like, about the split session (and if you can find a way to leave "it was Friday" out of your consideration it would probably be helpful, because that wasn't part of the plan nor something we would deliberately repeat). 

One thing we noticed and hadn't necessarily expected was that there seemed to us to be more energy in the room both sessions. One packed 2.5 hour session often seems like too much to allow people to maintain engagement by the time we end. One negative from our perspective was that managing two shorter packed agendas instead of one longer one, affords the chairs less flexibility. If a talk in session 1 runs short, it doesn't help us at all with session 2.

Your comments are welcome either on-list or unicast to the chairs, about whether you think this is worth repeating or whether you like the 2.5 hour single session format better.

Thanks,

--John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email