Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback?
Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 21 July 2018 18:46 UTC
Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C3B130E15; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5iLGbsCah_j; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x236.google.com (mail-pl0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4921130E0A; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f6-v6so6532506plo.1; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=f4ZybD8v7Z81EKEnm+QiRcmz2octvion6paBFrfe3LY=; b=ATU2nrrUFxEKf6E14ooKG22pDu/YGvxv/I4tBrfGCTf2sc/J0Poymtg5LeIWGqlqff ZT6NnZAftWekaHtRx+v2L0vmhYt0NXGCO3lcwSAs1c+MgHfgKndIkIYOs9MfwD6tiQDm uczCpzJQTDGDjAAbo9b3qcJSzW028+LRO7nYzCuklKA18l+FNB5FpnBWrx5uqkWRoQ/Q Qwh9wlCTAwWm41fG16TjQXgSPfpoqfx3WfIMnKOKOzyrP1dMvbeycsyWlI6jglJGdI3j +1eHOXTDbuLgMMKCxRf9WnJztljKJji++IgEhu1Dnh0oMIbEaioct4cP24Qm1VzmdBDH C51A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=f4ZybD8v7Z81EKEnm+QiRcmz2octvion6paBFrfe3LY=; b=NON4IKU1+//YMCsMYy57w5xZ01QKdPK3QVkGQ+bG+LL2UKDYazkDQiUP3S8V1Zrtgc 0ZKyIWjSRwAnIpowSF+yXomZxF3/cUiNF/IOO+elAiql8jWYGUymkXYFD3vdl1vVcE32 l7jXs7aCvVrfjmWea+sVM2SWKCYf5MP67ywBbgKRFYEMVLmr2DALjhasyFjEZrlyzIDV RrGC17F2h8mnj8Y/WRAYT25iUeci+t2GXaZMDcVUXbxFC4iGUhCTM8/rg89sMDHq5jd4 SDNGlNmhUofaiuiMWGl6eXjO7nKfainut0AJyR1/3tbbJjC/hW7o346LcuIfe5aFyTNu 3dhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEVOVtSoCY9F9bxQTWdwN6uEeylcYpSdfw0IRuZdkq92PgJaC4O FK42u0zyMIMuGa5aCeOIWkX9C//f
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcCAPp0WX9UD13Td91HkF0icmaEYkjie1NmyW35sCKIQRGMNHDdVPw9nmRHZIm1OliAydvNWw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4324:: with SMTP id i33-v6mr6719559pld.43.1532198790129; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (c-73-189-13-44.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.189.13.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n9-v6sm10533553pfg.21.2018.07.21.11.46.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15F79)
In-Reply-To: <20180721134253.GA37801@vurt.meerval.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:46:28 -0700
Cc: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CDD4A241-EF6F-4C49-82F3-C45136BF500C@gmail.com>
References: <1E638585-D2BC-472A-B854-E90660D19ED8@juniper.net> <20180721134253.GA37801@vurt.meerval.net>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/S0JrQnnqJPV5IH6rT2QFXxcJsPE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:46:34 -0000
+1 Job! Having had 2 RTGWG sessions for number of years - it gives you more flexibility, ability to accommodate late minute requests that seem of importance and reshuffle times in case of conflicts. Regards, Jeff > On Jul 21, 2018, at 06:42, Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> wrote: > > Dear John & Sue, > >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 01:29:18PM +0000, John Scudder wrote: >> Your comments are welcome either on-list or unicast to the chairs, >> about whether you think this is worth repeating or whether you like >> the 2.5 hour single session format better. > > I liked the format. I think the 2 session approach helps counter > potential for audience fatigue, but also has other advantages such as > easier to get a beverage or biobreak. In corporate context a 2,5 hour > meeting is rarely ideal either. Good idea! > > Kind regards, > > Job > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback? John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback? Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback? Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback? guntervandeveldecc