Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback?

guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com Sat, 21 July 2018 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E38130E0A; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHflhLlMUi5Z; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mr11p00im-asmtp004.me.com (mr11p00im-asmtp004.me.com [17.110.69.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FFD3130E9A; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.mr11p00im-asmtp004.me.com by mr11p00im-asmtp004.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) id <0PC800900C26FQ00@mr11p00im-asmtp004.me.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:53:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=04042017; t=1532199187; bh=R+w3Fg/2YRpaiopQTE61Gju0RURVnLZ1VhhwXQERX3M=; h=Date:From:To:Message-id:Subject:MIME-version:Content-type; b=rRq4ecp72kZqGSE98VpKbm4LXzBoLfCPAAF6emRa5odpM+WJ6Or6rPUOIFdil4JKA M0k80KgcokeHbTWWttHbnk4rid5rg6yhKKuoXDQqVsgutnVtSkbGqLMDSeLOLRhfHr XmOdX3bHW5BNA8JDmrWqeeELK5qQNWsz04bHbaUjq93Nxq2XDN5Ugrz/xJDGipvi2R 7PiLQRe/yf5Ztn7tDIQxFf52W8rrXk8U+RatmHMoViWB8vvelapi7ebwTLTacLsl9O PWi8Pt+GwsJbrvvB3+PhuAxdCOYT0C4pOeT7WiE+7cJxdydFCzT4UXpE7A90GMCqSW 4xACZus3AbYng==
Received: from icloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mr11p00im-asmtp004.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) with ESMTPSA id <0PC8008NWCGBGU30@mr11p00im-asmtp004.me.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:53:05 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-21_07:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1807210216
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:52:59 +0000
From: guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Message-id: <246E99BEEE5D0AE6.936717e5-22cd-4c6a-9d29-c31337afaf1f@mail.outlook.com>
In-reply-to: <CDD4A241-EF6F-4C49-82F3-C45136BF500C@gmail.com>
References: <1E638585-D2BC-472A-B854-E90660D19ED8@juniper.net> <20180721134253.GA37801@vurt.meerval.net> <CDD4A241-EF6F-4C49-82F3-C45136BF500C@gmail.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1011_307398706.1532199179445"
X-Mailer: Outlook for iOS and Android
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/PwG60jvvWiLrA5gRoId3O4VlzOc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] two-session IDR format feedback?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:53:11 -0000

Yes, the format was good... shorter slots do tend to get a slot on Friday as most shorter slots are available then. Its not reslly sn issue i find as it can be accomodated in advance in peoples agenda...




G/




Gunter Van de Velde







On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 8:46 PM +0200, "Jeff Tantsura" <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:










+1 Job!
Having had 2 RTGWG sessions for number of years - it gives you more flexibility, ability to accommodate late minute requests that seem of importance and reshuffle times in case of conflicts.

Regards,
Jeff

> On Jul 21, 2018, at 06:42, Job Snijders  wrote:
> 
> Dear John & Sue,
> 
>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 01:29:18PM +0000, John Scudder wrote:
>> Your comments are welcome either on-list or unicast to the chairs,
>> about whether you think this is worth repeating or whether you like
>> the 2.5 hour single session format better.
> 
> I liked the format. I think the 2 session approach helps counter
> potential for audience fatigue, but also has other advantages such as
> easier to get a beverage or biobreak. In corporate context a 2,5 hour
> meeting is rarely ideal either. Good idea!
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr