Re: admin dist/gp spec proposal

Enke Chen <enke@redback.com> Sat, 07 September 2002 06:48 UTC

Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA08999 for <idr-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 02:48:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 89CFA9120F; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 02:49:51 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 5BCC591213; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 02:49:51 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBC69120F for <idr@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 02:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 3F1095DE85; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 02:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@merit.edu
Received: from prattle.redback.com (prattle.redback.com [155.53.12.9]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141595DE73 for <idr@merit.edu>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 02:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from popserv3.redback.com (popserv3.redback.com [155.53.12.64]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AE81DCC6C; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 23:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from redback.com (fall.redback.com [155.53.36.220]) by popserv3.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA44F7E6C1; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 23:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>
Cc: idr@merit.edu, enke@redback.com
Subject: Re: admin dist/gp spec proposal
In-Reply-To: Message from Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com> of "Fri, 06 Sep 2002 16:05:02 EDT." <20020906160502.L844@nexthop.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:49:48 -0700
From: Enke Chen <enke@redback.com>
Message-Id: <20020907064948.EA44F7E6C1@popserv3.redback.com>
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

Jeff:

> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 16:05:02 -0400
> From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>
> To: "Natale, Jonathan" <JNatale@celoxnetworks.com>
> Cc: idr@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: admin dist/gp spec proposal
> Message-ID: <20020906160502.L844@nexthop.com>
> References: <1117F7D44159934FB116E36F4ABF221B020AF98F@celox-ma1-ems1.celoxnetworks.com>
> 

[snip]

> I should also point out that we have had the BGP Identifier arguments
> before.  We are trending this away from an actual IP to just an
> Identifer, which makes usage of it in ipv6 networks easier.

Indeed, and please take note of the IDR WG draft on the BGP Identifier:

     draft-ietf-idr-bgp-identifier-00.txt

-- Enke