Re: [Idr] Last Call on draft-ietf-idr-rfc2796bis-00.txt

Enke Chen <enke@redback.com> Fri, 30 April 2004 18:13 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19357 for <idr-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJcVy-0006FP-Rn for idr-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:13:34 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJcUU-0005xR-00 for idr-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:12:03 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJcTX-0005nH-03; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:11:03 -0400
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJcLs-0006g4-Dk; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:03:08 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJcGu-0005eA-Ue; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:58:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJcFv-0005RO-VS for idr@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:57:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA18200 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:56:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJcFt-0004sO-LS for idr@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:56:57 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJcEN-0004am-00 for idr@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:55:23 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJcDE-0004Sn-00 for idr@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:54:12 -0400
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([155.53.12.9]) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJc3X-00061s-Qv for idr@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:44:11 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D281B259469; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25789-06; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from popserv1.redback.com (popserv1.redback.com [155.53.12.56]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D91125946B; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from redback.com (fall.redback.com [155.53.44.81]) by popserv1.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3875F15D3C3; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>
Cc: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>, idr@ietf.org, enke@redback.com
Subject: Re: [Idr] Last Call on draft-ietf-idr-rfc2796bis-00.txt
In-Reply-To: Message from Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com> of "Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:40:18 EDT." <20040429224018.F21778@nexthop.com>
From: Enke Chen <enke@redback.com>
Message-Id: <20040430174337.3875F15D3C3@popserv1.redback.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Sender: idr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/idr/>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:43:36 -0700
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

Hi, Jeff:

> From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>
> To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
> Cc: idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Idr] Last Call on draft-ietf-idr-rfc2796bis-00.txt
> Message-ID: <20040429224018.F21778@nexthop.com>
> References: <200404162121.i3GLLDJ87448@merlot.juniper.net>
> 
> Additional nits:
> >    Their modification could potential result in routing loops.
> 
> s/potential/potentially/
> 
> In the changes, also note that you corrected transitive to
> non-transitive in the introduction.
> 
> I think ROUTER_ID should be consistently substituted with "BGP Identifier"
> per the current use in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-23

Ok.

> 
>    one. Using this attribute an RR can identify if the routing
>    information is looped back to the same cluster due to mis-
>    configuration. If the local CLUSTER_ID is found in the CLUSTER_LIST,
> 
> 
> s/is looped/has looped/

Ok.

> 
> Original text:
>    If the BGP Identifiers of two paths are equal when compared in the
>    route selection, then the path with the shorter CLUSTER_LIST length
> 
> Suggested change:
>    The BGP Decision Process Tie Breaking rules (Section 9.1.2.2 of the
>    BGP specification) is modified by inserting the following rule 
>    between f and g:
> 
>    The BGP Speaker SHOULD prefer all routes with the shorter
>    CLUSTER_LIST length.  If no CLUSTER_LIST path attribute is present,
>    the CLUSTER_LIST length is zero.

will revise the text along these lines.

Thanks.  -- Enke

> 
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:21:13PM -0700, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
> > Folks,
> > 
> > During the Last Call it would be greatly appreciated if folks would
> > read the document and comment on it to the IDR mailing list. In
> > other words, we need "yes, looks good" or "should fix this and
> > that", not just silence.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > Yakov.
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Haas 
> NextHop Technologies
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr


_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr