Re: Suggested changes to bgp4 draft for maximum prefix error handling

Enke Chen <enke@redback.com> Thu, 06 September 2001 22:00 UTC

Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (postfix@trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by nic.merit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA15247 for <idr-archive@nic.merit.edu>; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:00:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 009E1912D0; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id BC1FC912D1; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07D7912D0 for <idr@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id A1FD65DDA9; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@merit.edu
Received: from prattle.redback.com (prattle.redback.com [155.53.12.9]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739055DD9A for <idr@merit.edu>; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from popserv3.redback.com (popserv3.redback.com [155.53.12.64]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFB8F2C4B; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from redback.com (fall.redback.com [155.53.36.220]) by popserv3.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88B77E6C1; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>
Cc: idr@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Suggested changes to bgp4 draft for maximum prefix error handling
In-Reply-To: Message from Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com> of "Thu, 06 Sep 2001 17:55:01 EDT." <20010906175501.B26386@nexthop.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:59:52 -0700
From: Enke Chen <enke@redback.com>
Message-Id: <20010906215952.D88B77E6C1@popserv3.redback.com>
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:55:01 -0400
> From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>
> To: idr@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Suggested changes to bgp4 draft for maximum prefix error handling
> Message-ID: <20010906175501.B26386@nexthop.com>
> References: <vgi@zoreil.com> <20010906210053.C8C14979C1@popserv2.redback.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
> In-Reply-To: <20010906210053.C8C14979C1@popserv2.redback.com>; from enke@redback.com on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:00:52PM -0700
> Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
> Precedence: bulk
> 
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:00:52PM -0700, Enke Chen wrote:
> > In addition to the "Prefix limit exceed" subcode you are propsing, I would
> > like to suggest a few more subcodes:
> >  
> 
> [...]
> 
> >         o Peer deletion
> >  
> >         o Configuration change
> 
> How are these two distinguished?

To clarify:

            o Peer deletion

            o Configuration change (other than peer deletion)

-- Enke