Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 08 April 2020 16:02 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1936B3A0C9C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.347
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62S_ip1dkeA3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 09:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F33883A0C93 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 09:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.25.188;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, idr@ietf.org
References: <008901d60da2$74031370$5c093a50$@ndzh.com> <DDB167A3-977A-4815-AE9B-C5D404816CAE@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDB167A3-977A-4815-AE9B-C5D404816CAE@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 12:02:48 -0400
Message-ID: <00c501d60dbf$26a17b40$73e471c0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C6_01D60D9D.9F935DB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJSXj8xSpKU3KWOYHHPr+fE+FRy4gF9kCecp2rUGyA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200407-0, 04/07/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Dy81cHTAgWMTRBVWqr9gK0gmsl8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 16:02:54 -0000
Acee: My understanding is that the authors need to address the issues that Alvaro raised. See email on the subject on 2/21/2019. Keyur said he would get on it on 2/21. Life may be challenged. The other option is to Ping Gunter or Sri. I’ll ping them again today. Maybe it will raise the urgency and they can deal with it while we are offline Sue From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 9:00 AM To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 - Hi Sue, One clarification… From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 8:40 AM To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org> Subject: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 - IDR WG: A little status to read with your coffee this morning. We have an interim at 13:00 UTC (9:00 EDT, 6:00 PDT, 21:00 Bejing time) Please let me know if I’ve missed any updates. Cheers, Sue --------- At IESG in IETF LC 1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-19.txt – Shepherd: John Scudder Status: IETF LC ended, IESG telechat: 4/15 IESG Publication request: 7/9/2019 2 AD Reviews [8/2-9/10/2019, [1/17-1/23/2020] 2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08.txt [Shepherd: Susan Hares] Status: 3rd round of AD revisions IESG Publication requested: 10/15/2019 IETF WG LC: 6 days -------------- AD review – authors need to respond 1) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/> draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-14 - sent to IESG [Waiting 47 days] So, this draft requires a response from the authors to Alvaro? It hasn’t gone to full IESG yet – right? We have a couple LSR drafts with a normative reference. Thanks, Acee 2) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-05.txt [Waiting 57 days] ------------ WG past WG LC – stuck waiting for implementation reports on wiki [reported to have 2 implementations, but no details on wiki] 1) draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param 2) draft-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt --------- Drafts stuck post WG LC – waiting for minor edits 1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis.05.txt - ---- Flow specification drafts in WG LC 1) Draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10.txt Status: restarted [4/8 to 4/22] Status: IESG desires, but is it ready? Needed: implementation reports 2) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid/> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-11 Status: 3/13/ to 4/13 Status: light response, please comment Authors: Please fill out implementation report ----------- WG Adoption calls: 1) Draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec WG adoption: 3/30-4/13 Shepherd: Susan Hares Comment: only 1 response, heading toward “no consensus” 2) draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec-transport-mode WG Adoption: 3/30 – 4/13 Shepherd: Susan Hares Comment: only 1 response, heading toward “no consensus” 3) draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt WG adoption: 3/30 – 4/13 Shepherd: Susan Hares Comment: Positive response: Heading toward WG Adoption Request for input: ---------------------- draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04 Proposed WG LC drafts for flow-specification that were on hold: ------------------------------------------- [Authors should contact chairs] 1) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-interfaceset-05 – WG notes indicated this might go ahead without flow-specification v2 2) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect-10 – WG discussion needs to occur on whether flowspecification Proposed WG LCs (3/30 and 4/8) ---------------- 1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-08 – on hold pending revision -09 2) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-13 – in slides for 4/8 Proposed Adoption calls ----------------------- draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-udpate-00.txt
- [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 - Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 - Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 - Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 - Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 - Jeff Tantsura