[Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 08 April 2020 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940D43A097B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 05:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.347
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d_VVp4xxlgmr for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 05:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B531F3A0973 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 05:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.25.188;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:37:22 -0400
Message-ID: <008901d60da2$74031370$5c093a50$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008A_01D60D80.ECF3E470"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdYNokgRyeOIrfLpRmOFOKAsBaX81g==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200407-0, 04/07/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TnvJHlDgskNYBQQcxgS-W_LMz_o>
Subject: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 12:37:28 -0000

IDR WG:

 

A little status to read with your coffee this morning.   We have an interim
at 13:00 UTC (9:00 EDT,  6:00 PDT, 21:00 Bejing time) 

 

Please let me know if I've missed any updates. 

 

Cheers, Sue 

 

---------

At IESG in IETF LC 

1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-19.txt - 

    Shepherd: John Scudder 

    Status:  IETF LC ended, IESG telechat: 4/15 

    IESG Publication request: 7/9/2019 

   2  AD Reviews [8/2-9/10/2019, [1/17-1/23/2020]

   

2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08.txt

     [Shepherd: Susan Hares]

     Status:  3rd round of AD revisions  

     IESG Publication requested:  10/15/2019

     IETF WG LC:  6 days  

 

--------------

AD review - authors need to respond 

1)  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/>
draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-14 - sent to IESG 

[Waiting 47 days] 

 

2) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-05.txt 

[Waiting 57 days] 

------------

WG past WG LC - stuck  waiting for implementation reports on wiki

[reported to have 2 implementations, but no details on wiki] 

 

1) draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param

2) draft-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt 

---------

Drafts stuck post WG LC - waiting for minor edits 

1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis.05.txt  - 

----

Flow specification drafts in WG LC 

 

1) Draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10.txt

   Status: restarted [4/8 to 4/22]

   Status: IESG desires, but is it ready? 

   Needed:  implementation reports 

 

2)  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid/>
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-11

    Status:  3/13/ to 4/13 

    Status: light response, please comment 

    Authors:  Please fill out implementation report 

 

-----------

WG Adoption calls: 

 

   1) Draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec

       WG adoption:  3/30-4/13

        Shepherd: Susan Hares 

        Comment: only 1 response, heading toward "no consensus"

 

2) draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec-transport-mode

     WG Adoption: 3/30 - 4/13

      Shepherd: Susan Hares 

     Comment: only 1 response, heading toward "no consensus"

 

3) draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt 

    WG adoption: 3/30 - 4/13 

     Shepherd: Susan Hares 

    Comment: Positive response: Heading toward WG Adoption 

 

Request for input:

----------------------

draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04

 

Proposed WG LC drafts for flow-specification that were on hold: 

-------------------------------------------

[Authors should contact chairs] 

 

1)  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-interfaceset-05 - 

WG notes indicated this might go ahead without flow-specification v2 

 

2) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect-10 - 

WG discussion needs to occur on whether flowspecification 

 

 

Proposed WG LCs (3/30 and 4/8) 

----------------

1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-08 - on hold pending  revision -09

2)  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-13 - in slides for 4/8

 

 

Proposed Adoption calls  

-----------------------

draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-udpate-00.txt