Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Wed, 24 December 2014 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23471A8972 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:36:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y2XQHL4SDHon for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A32551A88CF for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:36:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BQK18630; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:36:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.41) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:35:59 +0000
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.128]) by nkgeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:35:49 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01
Thread-Index: AdAevaFpDeeSh60eTxGCTJRRuSQ2ogAY+4WQ
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:35:48 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927337EFD1E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <002301d01ebd$f7479460$e5d6bd20$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <002301d01ebd$f7479460$e5d6bd20$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927337EFD1Enkgeml512mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RddhWmxLGPvof72vuT1Or3O0AU4
Cc: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:36:04 -0000

Support. I've read this draft and think it provides a useful mechanism for performance routing.

One nit: In section 6, [I-D.ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions] was mentioned twice, I guess one of them should be replaced with [I-D.ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions].

Best regards,
Jie

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:37 PM
To: idr wg
Cc: Xuxiaohu
Subject: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01

This is to begin a 2 Week WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01  (12/23/2014 to 01/6/2014).  The draft can be accessed at:

 http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-idr-performance-routing/.

In your response, please discuss the pros/cons of this approach and indicate "support" or "no support".

Thank you,

Sue Hares