Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01

LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com> Thu, 25 December 2014 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456561A8854 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:15:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.39
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3SijJao8X0ED for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:15:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (smtpjc.telefonica.com [81.47.204.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09DE91A8853 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4FD2F00F7; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 19:15:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESTGVMSP104.EUROPE.telefonica.corp (unknown [10.92.4.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpjc.telefonica.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D58252F00D2; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 19:15:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.92.5.139) by tls.telefonica.com (10.93.6.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 19:15:24 +0100
Received: from DB4PR06MB576.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.192.23) by DB4PR06MB574.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.192.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.49.12; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:15:22 +0000
Received: from DB4PR06MB576.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.192.23]) by DB4PR06MB576.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.192.23]) with mapi id 15.01.0049.002; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:15:22 +0000
From: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01
Thread-Index: AdAgbI6qkRr6OEeERhGTJPSz3CMnAQ==
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:15:22 +0000
Message-ID: <DB4PR06MB576D18C5E4A6B1AE49BA8C39E550@DB4PR06MB576.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US
Content-Language: es-ES
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [83.60.109.201]
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com;
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB574;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB574;
x-forefront-prvs: 04362AC73B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(199003)(189002)(53754006)(479174004)(377454003)(62966003)(54356999)(76576001)(50986999)(92566001)(19580395003)(54206007)(19580405001)(19617315012)(107046002)(77156002)(74316001)(77096005)(66066001)(106356001)(20776003)(2351001)(86362001)(68736005)(64706001)(2656002)(54606007)(2900100001)(120916001)(97736003)(33656002)(31966008)(40100003)(122556002)(102836002)(15975445007)(110136001)(101416001)(46102003)(105586002)(87936001)(99396003)(2501002)(21056001)(19300405004)(230783001)(16236675004)(4396001)(19625215002)(19627235001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR06MB574; H:DB4PR06MB576.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: telefonica.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB4PR06MB576D18C5E4A6B1AE49BA8C39E550DB4PR06MB576eurprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Dec 2014 18:15:22.1287 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9744600e-3e04-492e-baa1-25ec245c6f10
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR06MB574
X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com
X-TM-AS-MML: No
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qqCF7jw5CdKF1CceWeomgft98Lc
Cc: "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:15:31 -0000

Hi all,

I do support the adoption of draft-xu-idr-performance-routing as WG document.

I have however a comment. In section 9, Security Considerations, bullet a, it is mentioned that “it MUST disable Performance Routing Capability negotiation between BGP peers which belong to different administration domains.” As stated along the draft, the performance-based routing capability is created to offer performance route selection criteria to customers of service providers which own networks formed by different ASes. In my understanding those customers are clearly different administration domains with regard the one of the service provider. Then Performance Routing Capability has to be enabled in that cases. So I would relax the sentence in the way: “it MAY be disabled …” or something like that, to be consistent  with the aim of  the draft.

Thanks

Best regards

Luis

From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:37 PM
To: idr wg
Cc: Xuxiaohu; John G. Scudder
Subject: WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01

This is to begin a 2 Week WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01  (12/23/2014 to 01/6/2014).  The draft can be accessed at:

 http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-idr-performance-routing/.

In your response, please discuss the pros/cons of this approach and indicate “support” or “no support”.

Thank you,

Sue Hares



________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição