IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-12 WG LC (5/24 to 6/7)

"Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD11312DA65 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 00:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geiPss4HGSHq for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 00:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B993712D639 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 00:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id D0516EE76F5D4; Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u4P7xReg021429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:27 GMT
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u4P7xQ5f006848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 25 May 2016 09:59:26 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA06.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.2.27]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:59:26 +0200
From: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-12 WG LC (5/24 to 6/7)
Thread-Index: AdG19Q0c4DmlRxlfTIa/f3EYODPjkAAZkxeA
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:26 +0000
Message-ID: <3F1E4C52-A3EF-48E0-A1F9-E5A3A71658B5@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <037f01d1b5fc$bfb596f0$3f20c4d0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <037f01d1b5fc$bfb596f0$3f20c4d0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3F1E4C52A3EF48E0A1F9E5A3A71658B5alcatellucentcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/T8JCyzopocuvBUluglm-WqUM20g>
Cc: "'Keyur Patel (keyupate)'" <keyupate@cisco.com>, 'David Ward' <wardd@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-12 WG LC (5/24 to 6/7)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:32 -0000

1)       Support, while making the following observations:

Section 4 – par1: is there a reason why the first ‘should’ is not a SHOULD? Same for the ‘may’?
Section 5 – par1: When using the more liberal policy, I believe it would make sense to indicate a message that an extended message was received while it was not expected at all
 G/


From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Tuesday 24 May 2016 at 22:42
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: "'Keyur Patel (keyupate)'" <keyupate@cisco.com>, 'David Ward' <wardd@cisco.com>
Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-12 WG LC (5/24 to 6/7)

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (5/24 to 6/7). The draft can be found at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages/

In your comments please provide the following information:

1)       Support/”no-support” of this draft being ready for publication,

2)       You know of an implementation for this draft, please report the implementation to the IDR Wiki

https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-implementations


3)       Do you have any concerns about extending the BGP messages.

Sue Hares and John Scudder

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email