Re: [Idr] Protocol Action: 'Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP' to BCP (draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-sets-06.txt)

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Mon, 10 October 2011 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7590221F8BFB; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-AlpmUklbsz; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74CC21F8BDE; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iaby26 with SMTP id y26so9494525iab.31 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5UYsIdqXLU1fiqgimBrQUnbV+/RtPILbQJMeJHokvVo=; b=uxgSW9mOeGCMpQWDp7QhxLJXMc565YE2V3HJ2BR+QLswbDkO2tQvnqL96p2UaR2Aof PUErNx96m6IHdNbSBH0mS6nF9/wgr4RADE/JPIY1VKttD1cc772EV/gvmL/JPKxkQFZS 214AabqMeHemX9aIoNR/pMI5C9UeYc1LzN1Co=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.6.102 with SMTP id 38mr2887389iby.62.1318273141310; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.59.206 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6D402923-AA10-4EA6-96DC-D88D8E935041@tcb.net>
References: <20111010160636.16168.55257.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6D402923-AA10-4EA6-96DC-D88D8E935041@tcb.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:59:01 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: yd6TB3GLlmGiWtg085fED1bpfCM
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaYkSJ+n_=Snrxt9o_-DZng+_jZL7+U16N_46xHMHfv7Ng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: idr mailing list <idr@ietf.org>, idr chair <idr-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Protocol Action: 'Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP' to BCP (draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-sets-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:59:02 -0000

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> wrote:
>
> Can someone clue me in as to when the status of this changed
> from Informational to BCP, in particular since this occurred
> after the IETF last call said intended publication was
> Informational?

I had thought (as had Warren when we last chatted ~20 mins ago) that
it was supposed to be Informational.

(as one data point in the wind)

-chris

> Also, what the implication of this might be on updating RFC 5065,
> RFC 4271, etc.., as it "recommends against" standardized protocol
> elements and doesn't contain RFC 2119 language.  The IESG comments
> discuss this as well, and I brought it up on the mailing list quite
> a while ago when asking about expressly about intended status.
>
> In general, I don't have a problem with this being BCP if the wording
> is cleaned up, but it certainly was not posited as BCP in WG or IETF
> last call or discussed in the WG to that effect with any response.
>
> -danny
>
>
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 12:06 PM, The IESG wrote:
>
>> The IESG has approved the following document:
>> - 'Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP'
>>  (draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-sets-06.txt) as a BCP
>>
>> This document is the product of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group.
>>
>> The IESG contact persons are Stewart Bryant and Adrian Farrel.
>>
>> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-sets/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Technical Summary
>>
>> This document provides advice to operators. It deprecates
>> the use of the AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET types of
>> the AS_PATH in BGPv4. This is done to simplify the
>> design and implementation of the BGP protocol and to make
>> the semantics of the originator of a route more clear.
>>
>> Working Group Summary
>>
>> This document was adopted as a WG item on
>> Oct 25th, 2010. There was an initial WGLC
>> that concluded on April 13th, 2010. Comments
>> from the initial WGLC were integrated and a
>> second WGLC held, which concluded on May17, 2011.
>>
>> Document Quality
>>
>> This note provides advice to operators proposing that
>> they cease using a current BGP protocol feature.
>>
>> Personnel
>>
>> John Scudder (jgs@juniper.net) is the document shepherd.
>> Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com) is the responsible AD.
>>
>> RFC Editor Note
>>
>> There is no RFC2119 language used in the draft.
>>
>> Please remove section 2 - the RFC2119 section and the
>> RFC2119 reference.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idr mailing list
>> Idr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>