IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-sas-idr-maxprefix-inbound-02.txt

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Fri, 23 April 2021 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C443A10DF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i6A7U0RhEX-X for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sea.shrubbery.net (sea.shrubbery.net [129.250.47.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023F13A10E8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by sea.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 6B45D25491F; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:03:33 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>, max@stucchi.ch, maelmans@juniper.net, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YINENaRdV/EP4Wm9@shrubbery.net>
References: <161843563034.11054.13811966622190622752@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOj+MMH=cCgtn7cL=HvOjQOMH1B9tmjOYOT04jXE9oky4SuevQ@mail.gmail.com> <YHhJTB51/joiz9Pg@snel> <CAOj+MMEFOGm=hCQcZNAUoN8vsPeVT3gqnjsQihUMJo4AOObZfw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEFOGm=hCQcZNAUoN8vsPeVT3gqnjsQihUMJo4AOObZfw@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/sF_b45elb7JLeYWdnj_YxYN5R44>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-sas-idr-maxprefix-inbound-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:03:36 -0000

Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:34:35PM +0200, Robert Raszuk:
> The observation I am trying to make is that IMHO soft in is not really a
> Pre Policy in a sense that you must not apply Prefix Limit to it. Otherwise
> the entire idea of soft-in becomes questionable.

the rib that soft reconfig uses has to be subject to a limit; without that,
the device is not entirely protected from memory exhaustion from a massive
leak (eg: every possible /128).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email