IDR WG charter
Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net> Mon, 26 August 2002 14:18 UTC
Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (postfix@trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA08944 for <idr-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 5D25991245; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id E21179124A; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:19:02 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20A691244 for <idr@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 9F6885DDAD; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@merit.edu
Received: from merlot.juniper.net (natint.juniper.net [207.17.136.129]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311575DD93 for <idr@merit.edu>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from juniper.net (garnet.juniper.net [172.17.28.17]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7QEI0m49021; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:18:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net)
Message-Id: <200208261418.g7QEI0m49021@merlot.juniper.net>
To: idr@merit.edu
Cc: skh@nexthop.com
Subject: IDR WG charter
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <72627.1030371480.1@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:18:00 -0700
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
Folks, Please comment on the revised charter proposed by Bill and Alex (see below). The deadline for comments is Sep 10, 2002. Sue & Yakov ------- Forwarded Message Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:11:10 -0700 From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> To: idr@merit.edu Subject: BGP spec and IDR WG charter Dear IDR WG, After some consideration, the Routing Area Directors have decided not to forward any IDR documents for IESG consideration until the base BGP spec update is finished.[*] Despite the best efforts of all involved, the spec update has been taking an incredible amount of time. We take this step in order to focus all possible resources of the WG community on the BGP spec update. This may seem like a negative action. On the contrary, it is meant to support the accomplishment of the working group's goals.[**] The milestone for the submission of the BGP4 draft to the IESG was scheduled for January 2002. Attached is a proposed update for the IDR working group charter. Note that we just made up the dates in the goals and milestones, and the WG should come up with realistic ones. Bill and Alex [*] "finished" means, in this case, WG consensus, WG Last Call, AD Review, IETF Last Call, and IESG approval for publication. [**] In further support of the goal of having a quality specification that reflects current reality, the ADs have been working on assembling a team of reviewers that consists primarily of protocol implementors, who have committed their time to examine the spec. We will be sending another message to this list explaining the details of how this team will do its work. - - - - The Inter-Domain Routing Working Group is chartered to standardize and promote the Border Gateway Protocol Version 4 (BGP-4) [RFC 1771] capable of supporting policy based routing for TCP/IP internets. The objective is to promote the use of BGP-4 to support IP version 4 and IP version 6. The working group will continue to work on improving the scalability of BGP. The current tasks of the WG are limited to: - - Revise and clarify the base BGP4 document (RFC 1771). Note that RFC 1771 no longer documents existing practice and one goal of the update is document existing practice. Determine whether the document can be advanced as full Standard or needs to recycle at Proposed or Draft Standard. - - Submit updated MIBs to accompany the revised base BGP4 document. Once these tasks are completed, work will progress on the following: - - Review and Evaluate Existing RFCs on AS Confederations and Route Reflection. If changes are needed, create and advance revisions. - - Review RFC 2385 (Protection of BGP via TCP MD5 signature) to see if any changes need to be made based on current Internet practice or based on the changes to the current bgp draft. If changes are needed, create an revision. Issue the WG Last Call on advancing the document to Draft Standard. - - Produce an updated MIB for AS Confederations, Route Reflection, Communities, Multi-Protocol BGP, etc.. - - Review and evaluate Multiprotocol BGP (RFC 2858) for advancement as Draft Standard. - - Complete work on an Extended Community Attribute. Develop MIB for BGP Extended Communities. - - Extend BGP to support a 4-byte AS number, develop plan for transitioning to usage of 4-byte AS numbers - - Progress along the IETF standards track a BGP-based mechanism that allows a BGP speaker to send to its BGP peer a set of route filters that the peer would use to constrain/filter its outbound routing updates to the speaker. Currently defined in draft-ietf-idr-route-filter-03.txt. - - Progress along standards track an Outbound Router Filter (ORF) type for BGP, that can be used to perform aspath based route filtering. The ORF-type will support aspath based route filtering as well as regular expression based matching for address groups. Currently defined in draft-ietf-idr-aspath-orf-00.txt. Tasks for this working group are limited to those listed above; new items to be added to the charter must be approved by the IESG. Goals and Milestones DONE Submit BGP Capability Advertisement to the IESG NOV 02 Submit BGP4 document to IESG. DEC 02 Submit updated base BGP4 MIB to IESG. MAR 03 Submit extensible BGP MIB to IESG. MAR 03 Submit Extended Communities draft to IESG. MAR 03 Submit 4-byte AS ID to IESG. MAR 03 Initial Draft for RFC2858 (if needed) MAR 03 BGP TCP MD5 signatures document to IESG. MAR 03 Outbound Route Filter, Prefix and ASpath ORF draft to IESG. ------- End of Forwarded Message
- IDR WG charter Yakov Rekhter
- Re: IDR WG charter Jeffrey Haas
- Re: IDR WG charter Danny McPherson
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- IDR WG charter Yakov Rekhter
- Re: IDR WG charter Russ White
- Re: IDR WG charter Russ White
- accept Randy Bush
- Re: IDR WG charter Jeffrey Haas
- Re: IDR WG charter Robert Raszuk
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- RE: IDR WG charter Natale, Jonathan
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- Re: IDR WG charter Alex Zinin
- Re: IDR WG charter Jeffrey Haas
- Re: IDR WG charter Jeffrey Haas
- Re: IDR WG charter Tom Petch
- RE: IDR WG charter Bill Fenner
- Re: IDR WG charter andrewl
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- Re: IDR WG charter Alex Zinin
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- Re: IDR WG charter Alex Zinin
- RE: IDR WG charter Bill Fenner
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- Re: IDR WG charter Robert Raszuk
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- RE: IDR WG charter Randy Bush
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- Re: IDR WG charter Jeffrey Haas
- RE: IDR WG charter Abarbanel, Benjamin
- IDR WG charter Yakov Rekhter
- Re: IDR WG charter Randy Bush
- RE: IDR WG charter Gray, Eric
- Re: IDR WG charter Yakov Rekhter
- Re: IDR WG charter Jeffrey Haas
- RE: IDR WG charter Gray, Eric
- Re: IDR WG charter Jeffrey Haas
- RE: IDR WG charter Sivananda Ramnath
- Re: IDR WG charter Mathew Richardson
- Re: IDR WG charter Jeffrey Haas