IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IDR WG charter

"Abarbanel, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Abarbanel@Marconi.com> Wed, 04 September 2002 15:46 UTC

Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (postfix@trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA06154 for <idr-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:46:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1AF2F9125C; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:47:04 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id D97C191275; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:47:03 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7229125C for <idr@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:47:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id A6B835DDC6; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:47:02 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@merit.edu
Received: from mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.68.6]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243BA5DDB8 for <idr@merit.edu>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:47:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03252; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:46:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from whq-msgrtr-01.pit.comms.marconi.com (whq-msgrtr-01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20499; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by whq-msgrtr-01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <R68QLDVK>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:46:59 -0400
Message-ID: <39469E08BD83D411A3D900204840EC55BC2DA9@vie-msgusr-01.dc.fore.com>
From: "Abarbanel, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Abarbanel@Marconi.com>
To: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@nexthop.com>, "Abarbanel, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Abarbanel@Marconi.com>
Cc: idr@merit.edu
Subject: RE: IDR WG charter
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 11:46:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

Jeff:
  I see no discussion on this list of the work to complete the base spec
other than
the review and update of Sue's FSM spec. So unless, all this effort is done
in a
private list or behind the scenes, I dont see how it is detracted by new
work topics
discussed here?

Ben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:jhaas@nexthop.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:56 AM
> To: Abarbanel, Benjamin
> Cc: idr@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: IDR WG charter
> 
> 
> Ben,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:39:52PM -0400, Abarbanel, Benjamin wrote:
> > At the rate things get done it will be 1-2 years before the 
> old work is
> > completed
> > (makes it to RFC status), where does that put us with new 
> fresh ideas?
> 
> It shouldn't take that long.  The amount of effort the working group
> has expended on debating new drafts would probably have pushed us
> to a final draft on bgp if we had used the same effort.
> 
> > Ben
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Haas 
> NextHop Technologies
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status