Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [IP911 and preemption]
"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Tue, 05 July 2005 22:57 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA13064 for <ieprep-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:57:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DpwXo-0005wk-PN for ieprep-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 19:09:37 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dpw62-00086I-Aw; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:40:54 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dpw5z-00083T-77; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:40:53 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA10922; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:40:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DpwKe-0002pW-EU; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:56:01 -0400
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jul 2005 15:28:04 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,263,1115017200"; d="scan'208"; a="290119634:sNHT38020882"
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j65MRUW1022254; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:27:59 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp.cisco.com ([10.21.120.51]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:27:58 -0700
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20050705172249.0266cfb8@email.cisco.com>
X-Sender: jmpolk@email.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:27:56 -0500
To: Jason Michael Canon <fiatlux@adelphia.net>, Jason Michael Canon <fiatlux@adelphia.net>, "King, Kimberly S." <KIMBERLY.S.KING@saic.com>, Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [IP911 and preemption]
In-Reply-To: <012b01c57e7f$911ed330$6401a8c0@canondownstairs>
References: <OF162588F5.55F41921-ON85257031.006CE6ED-85257031.006E31C5@csc.com> <011401c57e7f$05227da0$6401a8c0@canondownstairs>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2005 22:27:58.0525 (UTC) FILETIME=[CBE9C6D0:01C581B0]
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Cc: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org, ieprep@ietf.org, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, sob@harvard.edu
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Jason At 04:58 PM 7/1/2005 -0400, Jason Michael Canon wrote: >Sorry, I meant GETS/WPS and MLPP. > >----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Michael Canon" ><fiatlux@adelphia.net> >To: "King, Kimberly S." <KIMBERLY.S.KING@saic.com>; "Janet P Gunn" ><jgunn6@csc.com> >Cc: <ieprep-bounces@ietf.org>; <ieprep@ietf.org>; ><jon.peterson@neustar.biz>; <sob@harvard.edu> >Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 4:54 PM >Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? > > >I have a generic, high level question. > >As a civilian in an emergency situation I call 9-1-1 to report some life >threatening situation in my >house. IEPREP doesn't address 911 calling, ECRIT does - and currently has frowned upon the use of prioritizing sessions/flows/calls in its efforts to date. >While the call is in progress a sufficient number of government >officials evoke a GETS/WAS >or MOP capability and my call is effectively preempted or degraded to a >level that is not tolerable. As Dennis and others pointed out, currently, there is no preemption on the public circuit-switched networks for GETS. I believe the E911 example is the reason for the rule of "no preemption" by GETS. >Thanks, >Jason cheers, James ******************* Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented. _______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] Re-charter? King, Kimberly S.
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?time slot? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Jason Michael Canon
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Jason Michael Canon
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Steve Silverman
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Bose, Pratik
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [Sessions?] James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [solutions already?] James M. Polk
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [MLPP limited to privateā¦ James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [IP911 and preemption] James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [MLPP limited to privateā¦ Janet Gunn
- [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Ken Carlberg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? James M. Polk
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? King, Kimberly S.