IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT

Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu> Wed, 20 March 1996 12:42 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09537; 20 Mar 96 7:42 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09533; 20 Mar 96 7:42 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05118; 20 Mar 96 7:42 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09525; 20 Mar 96 7:42 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09521; 20 Mar 96 7:42 EST
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05113; 20 Mar 96 7:42 EST
Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9-MT2.02) id HAA13948; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 07:37:24 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 07:37:24 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <199603201237.HAA13948@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: brian@dxcoms.cern.ch, sob@newdev.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, jhalpern@us.newbridge.com

Brian,
	I forwarded your note on to the lawyers but my guess is that
as you point out, the US legal system will ignore this.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email