Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT
Joel Halpern <jhalpern@us.newbridge.com> Wed, 20 March 1996 03:02 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28781; 19 Mar 96 22:02 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28777; 19 Mar 96 22:02 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17052; 19 Mar 96 22:02 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28770; 19 Mar 96 22:02 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28766; 19 Mar 96 22:02 EST
Received: from ns.newbridge.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17047; 19 Mar 96 22:02 EST
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ns.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA28491 for <iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:02:42 -0500
Received: from portero(192.75.23.66) by ns via smap (V1.3) id sma028488; Tue Mar 19 22:02:38 1996
Received: from mako.us.Newbridge.com (mako.us.newbridge.com [138.120.85.99]) by kanmaster (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA17706 for <iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:02:38 -0500
Received: from lobster.newbridge by mako.us.Newbridge.com (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA11880; Tue, 19 Mar 96 21:53:54 EST
Received: by lobster.newbridge (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA08312; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:00:58 +0500
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:00:58 +0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Joel Halpern <jhalpern@us.newbridge.com>
Message-Id: <9603200300.AA08312@lobster.newbridge>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Content-Length: 608
Yes, the section George was suggesting was relevant (at least to the ATM Forum, and maybe to the IETF) is 273, d, 4. Presumably the "Manufacturing" in the section title was not deemed to be sufficient. The other pointer he gave me was to the announement of the proposed rule-making. This was reportedly announced in the March 5th Federal Register (with a comment due date of April 2nd), item 96-87. I sure hope that this clause does not apply to us, or that our procedures would supercede it, but that is not exactly clear. Thank you, Joel M. Halpern jhalpern@newbridge.com Newbridge Networks Inc.
- The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Joel Halpern
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Scott Bradner
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Joel Halpern
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Scott Bradner
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Steve Coya
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Scott Bradner