Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT
Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Wed, 20 March 1996 14:33 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11660; 20 Mar 96 9:33 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11656; 20 Mar 96 9:33 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06516; 20 Mar 96 9:33 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11649; 20 Mar 96 9:33 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11645; 20 Mar 96 9:33 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06511; 20 Mar 96 9:33 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11633; 20 Mar 96 9:33 EST
To: Joel Halpern <jhalpern@us.newbridge.com>
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:45:15 +0500." <9603192245.AA08229@lobster.newbridge>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:33:06 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9603200933.aa11633@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Joel, What timing! I was working on a message to the ISOC folks about this very topic, following a phone call with Art Reilly (Bellcore). >> 1) There is a section (242 or 243 according to George's memory) of the >> bill which specifically applies to non-sanctioned standards groups. >> There apparently also is language about standards groups whose members >> "control" more than 30% of the "access lines". Whether either category >> includes the IETF I do not know. It is Section 273, paragraph 4 that discusses non-accredited standards activities. Paragraph 5 of section 273 goes into alternative dispute resolution, specifically referring the problem of dispute resolution to the FCC to define how these disputes are to be resolved. Last week (March 12th), the FCC issued a PROPOSAL which essentially states their preferred method of resolution is through the use of a 3rd party binding arbitration. Regardless of who recognizes our standards, the IETF is not an accredited standards making group.
- The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Joel Halpern
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Scott Bradner
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Joel Halpern
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Scott Bradner
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Steve Coya
- Re: The IETF & The new Telecommunications ACT Scott Bradner