Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 1108

"Christian Huitema" <huitema@huitema.net> Thu, 22 May 2014 06:44 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CBE1A00DD for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 23:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pvVwV8XmwJY8 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 23:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xsmtp03.mail2web.com (xsmtp03.mail2web.com [168.144.250.223]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D25841A00E7 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 23:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.2.12] (helo=xmail02.myhosting.com) by xsmtp03.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1WnMjt-0007Nr-Si for ietf-privacy@ietf.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 02:44:30 -0400
Received: (qmail 30546 invoked from network); 22 May 2014 06:44:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO HUITEMA5) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[72.235.170.205]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail02.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; 22 May 2014 06:44:28 -0000
From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@huitema.net>
To: "'S Moonesamy'" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
References: <02e501cf7573$c123ee40$436bcac0$@huitema.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140521213233.0c503e30@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140521213233.0c503e30@resistor.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 23:44:26 -0700
Message-ID: <031901cf7589$479266e0$d6b734a0$@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQFMUPUaKyB5ggW/pZrOYoQHCxMSdAJVC4xZnD/GOpA=
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/C4o5Mknwv_UuSjODpQPUnJnJEtA
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 1108
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 06:44:36 -0000

>> This was then. By now, IP options are very rarely used. The RFC 
>> should probably be reclassified as historic.
>
> RFC 1108 is already classified as Historic.

Oops. That's what I get for trying the lottery. The UI just provides the RFC
text, which in the case of 1108 does not present its status. 

As I mentioned before, the lottery should only return RFC that are on the
standard track and are not obsolete. Otherwise, we are wasting the
reviewers' efforts.

-- Christian Huitema

This message has no relation with terrorism, jihad, or bomb making. There is
no point archiving it in NSA servers. Although of course I know they will,
they spy on everything.